Beware that I will have to retag the release...

performance-jmh were part of the source, but not part of the release,
so the pom didn't get updated.



I will redo and retag the release.

On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 2:10 PM Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I tested the PR and merged it.
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 10:31 AM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Can someone review this PR and merge it?
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3431
> >
> >
> > Other than that, any other PR that needs to be merged.. I should start
> > the release tomorrow, monday on my  mid morning EST time. that will
> > give Europeans some time to work on it as well :) unless someone asks
> > me to halt it (and with a good reason of course).
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 1:40 PM Clebert Suconic
> > <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > It depends on the size of the PR. If it's something simple, low risk I
> > > would say we can wait for it.. however if it's something major and has
> > > some risk, I would prefer having a lot of full testsuite runs (that I
> > > do on a CI I have access) between when a major PR is merged and a
> > > release.
> > >
> > >
> > > if you're adding a service loader without changing much at the server
> > > dependencies we can merge it... otherwise we can wait another release.
> > > (we don't need to wait 2 months for another release... we can make
> > > another whenever needed).
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:43 AM Christoph Läubrich <m...@laeubi-soft.de>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It might be too late, but I'm currently investigate in an issue related
> > > > to [1] and like to provide a PR the next days that add support of
> > > > providing sasl mechanism through java-service-loader is there any
> > chance
> > > > (assuming I got everything done in time) to include this in the next
> > > > release?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-33
> > > >
> > > > Am 04.02.21 um 16:36 schrieb Clebert Suconic:
> > > > > everythign is merged...
> > > > >
> > > > > There is one final issue I'm after though.. .I have made libaio to
> > > > > close files asynchronously. I have seen an eventual failure on the
> > > > > testsuite (well, a warning to be more precise) on waiting to close
> > > > > files... that I am after.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I will postpone this release to monday to give me time to find that
> > > > > issue before I release. Sorry for any inconvenience.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 3:42 AM Emmanuel Hugonnet <
> > ehugo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hello,
> > > > >> It would be nice if we could have
> > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3412 in this release :)
> > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > >> Emmanuel
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Le 29/01/2021 à 17:53, Clebert Suconic a écrit :
> > > > >>> I plan to do an artemis release some time next week (around Wed)
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I will check on pending PRs... (please give me a hand also on
> > merging stuff)
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> if there's anything you need my attention on a particular PR please
> > > > >>> mention it here on this thread..
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I will make sure we merge the Jakarta integration before this
> > release BTW.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I am also postponing JDK upgrade for a release after this, given
> > > > >>> Wildfly (Emmanuel) request to keep the next release as JDK 8 due to
> > > > >>> JavaEE needs.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Clebert Suconic
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
> >
> >



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Reply via email to