Hi Rod- Thanks for sharing your efforts. Please add your notes to the JIRA here so we have tracking: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-8149 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-8149>
I started listing out some feature ideas, and it would make sense to track the discussion there so we capture the historical. Thanks! Matt Pavlovich > On Feb 17, 2021, at 9:36 AM, Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) > <jenki...@nationwide.com> wrote: > > Hello All, > > Quick introduction: My name is Rod. I work with Chuck. I am stepping in > while he is out. I am the coworker who does the TomEE images. > > I have a question on the tarballs on https://archive.apache.org > <https://archive.apache.org/> and https://repo1.maven.org > <https://repo1.maven.org/>. I noticed that the images are not the same SHA > and not the same size. Is there a reason for that? > > BTW, the Dockerfile is mostly complete, > https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq/blob/master/classic/5.16/jre11/openjdk-buster/Dockerfile > > <https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq/blob/master/classic/5.16/jre11/openjdk-buster/Dockerfile>. > I think the only thing left was getting the maven download to work as the > fallback to the other repos. I can still make that work, but I thought it > was strange to see a difference in the sizes of the files. > > This is what we are proposing. I am going to start on the other options > later today. We would be happy for any feedback. > > Thanks, > Rod. > > > From: "Shank, Charles R" <shan...@nationwide.com > <mailto:shan...@nationwide.com>> > Date: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 at 8:49 AM > To: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>, Matt > Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com <mailto:mattr...@gmail.com>>, > "dev@activemq.apache.org <mailto:dev@activemq.apache.org>" > <dev@activemq.apache.org <mailto:dev@activemq.apache.org>> > Cc: "Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)" <jenki...@nationwide.com > <mailto:jenki...@nationwide.com>> > Subject: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ > > Jean, > > I agree we should make this its own issue and open up the discussion to the > ActiveMQ community > > Currently, we are working on the following repository to provide generic > images available to the ActiveMQ community. You can follow our progress > here: https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq > <https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq> > > Because the needs of the community are varied, we recommend making multiple > versions of ActiveMQ classic and Artemis. The repos also will be created to > include OpenJDK and AdoptopenJDK. We also recommend leaving room for other > operating systems other than Debian and multiple versions of JDK within both > OpenJDK and AdoptopenJDK. > > Given the number of options, we are not sure how we would go about using a > module to maintain the dockerfiles, but would be open to it. Once we get > our dockerimages complete, we can discuss how they are maintained going > forward. We will also investigate with the folks at > https://github.com/docker-library <https://github.com/docker-library> to see > what is required to get our images listed as the official images. I have a > coworker that is responsible for the TomEE official images and has some > contacts there. > > We would like to get the communities thoughts and input on this course of > action. > > Thank you > Chuck Shank > > >
