No problem, thanks for taking on the JDK 11 work. It is going to be very nice to not have to switch my JDK to run builds anymore.
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 7:01 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Thanks a lot Chris ! > > I’m moving forward on the javadoc. > > Regards > JB > > > Le 21 mai 2021 à 12:21, Christopher Shannon < > christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > I'm taking a look now. The main thing I notice is the assembly plugin > > change has caused my build to break with a group id is too big error > (which > > I've seen before). i can push a fix for it. > > > > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 5:25 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> I created PR https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/647 < > >> https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/647> related to JDK11 build > >> support. > >> > >> This PR includes: > >> 1. Add JAXB and related wherever it’s required > >> 2. Update of most of the Maven plugins > >> 3. Refactoring of the OSGi headers and use of maven-bundle-plugin 5.1.2 > to > >> fix the OSGi headers > >> 4. Upgrade Jenkinsfile to use JDK11 > >> 5. Some code style change (to prepare/test the changes) > >> 6. The build passed on my machine, but I ignored two tests failing on > >> Jenkins: > >> - activemq-mqtt: MQTTConnectTest#testParallelConnectPlain > >> - activemq-runtime-config: SpringBeanTest#testModifiable > >> > >> If there’s no objection, I would like to squash & merge the PR as it > >> blocks me to move forward on other PRs (spring5, camel cleanup, etc). > >> > >> No objection ? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Regards > >> JB > >> > >> > >
