This weekend JB announced [1] the availability of official Docker images for ActiveMQ "Classic" in the "apache/activemq" namespace [2].
Perhaps I missed it, but I don't recall (and can't find) any discussion of or notification about this. Users will certainly expect images for both "Classic" and Artemis so my concern is regarding the namespace. If both "Classic" and Artemis share the apache/activemq namespace directly then there may eventually be version number conflicts and there certainly will be confusion about which version is which. Before these images are widely adopted I think the namespace should be clarified just as it is on the website so that ActiveMQ "Classic" uses "apache/activemq/classic" and ActiveMQ Artemis uses "apache/activemq/artemis". Thoughts? Justin [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/4cqbm0gsbj184vrp13yorcd2rrbdcsmx [2] https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/activemq/tags
