Hi Justin, It has been discussed but not the name specifically.
As we use apache/activemq-artemis, I thought "logical" to use apache/activemq (but maybe activemq-classic makes more sense). I'm not sure we will be able to use apache/activemq/classic and apache/activemq/artemis, but we can definitely use apache/activemq-classic as apache/activemq-artemis. I can rename right now. Thoughts ? Regards JB On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 3:57 PM Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> wrote: > > This weekend JB announced [1] the availability of official Docker images > for ActiveMQ "Classic" in the "apache/activemq" namespace [2]. > > Perhaps I missed it, but I don't recall (and can't find) any discussion of > or notification about this. Users will certainly expect images for both > "Classic" and Artemis so my concern is regarding the namespace. If both > "Classic" and Artemis share the apache/activemq namespace directly then > there may eventually be version number conflicts and there certainly will > be confusion about which version is which. > > Before these images are widely adopted I think the namespace should be > clarified just as it is on the website so that ActiveMQ "Classic" uses > "apache/activemq/classic" and ActiveMQ Artemis uses > "apache/activemq/artemis". > > Thoughts? > > > Justin > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/4cqbm0gsbj184vrp13yorcd2rrbdcsmx > [2] https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/activemq/tags
