I don't think it's a good idea to delete anything unless it's just an empty repo so we can preserve the history.
I think the standard practice is to instead ask infra to archive the repos and they become read only. We did that with Apollo: https://github.com/apache/activemq-apollo On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 3:40 PM Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> wrote: > During the process of researching the proposed move to GitHub Issues I > reviewed all ActiveMQ Git repos [1]. I noticed a handful that haven't been > updated in a long time and appear to be defunct: > > - activemq-stomp - https://github.com/apache/activemq-stomp > - activemq-activeio - https://github.com/apache/activemq-activeio > - activemq-protobuf - https://github.com/apache/activemq-protobuf > - activemq-web - https://github.com/apache/activemq-web > - activemq-nms-ems - https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-ems > - activemq-nms-xms - https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-xms > - activemq-nms-zmq - https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-zmq > - activemq-nms-msmq - https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-msmq > - activemq-nms-stomp* - *https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-stomp > > Most of these repos haven't seen a meaningful update in almost a decade. > Does anybody have concerns with deleting any of these? > > My goal here is to simplify our code footprint and clarify what code-bases > are functional and actively maintained. > > > Justin > > [1] > > https://github.com/orgs/apache/repositories?language=&q=activemq&sort=&type=all >
