Agreed. Good call on the archiving.
Justin On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 3:58 PM Christopher Shannon < christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think it's a good idea to delete anything unless it's just an empty > repo so we can preserve the history. > > I think the standard practice is to instead ask infra to archive the repos > and they become read only. We did that with Apollo: > https://github.com/apache/activemq-apollo > > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 3:40 PM Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > During the process of researching the proposed move to GitHub Issues I > > reviewed all ActiveMQ Git repos [1]. I noticed a handful that haven't > been > > updated in a long time and appear to be defunct: > > > > - activemq-stomp - https://github.com/apache/activemq-stomp > > - activemq-activeio - https://github.com/apache/activemq-activeio > > - activemq-protobuf - https://github.com/apache/activemq-protobuf > > - activemq-web - https://github.com/apache/activemq-web > > - activemq-nms-ems - https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-ems > > - activemq-nms-xms - https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-xms > > - activemq-nms-zmq - https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-zmq > > - activemq-nms-msmq - https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-msmq > > - activemq-nms-stomp* - *https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-stomp > > > > Most of these repos haven't seen a meaningful update in almost a decade. > > Does anybody have concerns with deleting any of these? > > > > My goal here is to simplify our code footprint and clarify what > code-bases > > are functional and actively maintained. > > > > > > Justin > > > > [1] > > > > > https://github.com/orgs/apache/repositories?language=&q=activemq&sort=&type=all > > >
