Jira description updated, and https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1545 raised for review.
On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 at 17:00, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote: > > Those elements are self-serve, no need to bother asking Infra > anything, we can just edit the project description in Jira and update > the repo description in the .asf.yaml file (I'll do both now, if you > what to close your Jira) > > On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 at 16:22, Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi JB- > > > > I think a new static website generation with modern them is a great idea. I > > think we should prioritize that, since any new docs, etc can all reference > > the new layout (we should maintain a healthy set of static redirects b/c of > > the legacy pages already indexed by search engines). > > > > I created an INFRA ticket for the JIRA and GitHub rename of ‘ActiveMQ > > Classic’ to simply ‘ActiveMQ’ per the resolution: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-27427 > > > > Thanks, > > Matt > > > > > On Nov 20, 2025, at 10:13 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > Now that we have two Top-Level Projects (ActiveMQ and Artemis), I > > > would like to propose the following action plan across five key areas > > > for discussion: > > > > > > 1. Website > > > I propose two immediate actions regarding the ActiveMQ website: > > > a. We should quickly remove the term "Classic" from the project name > > > and all mentions across the website. > > > b. I propose an important refactoring of the website structure, > > > leveraging a modern static site generator such as Antora, Docusaurus, > > > or Hugo (see Point 2 for related details). > > > > > > 2. Documentation > > > We have a significant amount of work ahead to ensure the documentation > > > content is current and complete. To facilitate this, I propose > > > adopting a framework like Hugo to manage documentation across multiple > > > versions effectively. > > > > > > 3. GitHub Issues > > > I plan to restart the discussion regarding migrating our issue > > > tracking from Jira to GitHub Issues. This will be initiated in a > > > separate thread. > > > > > > 4. GitHub Actions (CI) > > > I have started implementing GitHub Actions for our Continuous > > > Integration (CI) process (as demonstrated in > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1497 > > > (https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1497)). This setup will also > > > allow us to manage dependency updates automatically via Dependabot. > > > > > > 5. Automated Release/ATR > > > Building upon the work in Point 4, we will be able to transition > > > toward Automatic Release CI/ATR. This topic will also be discussed in > > > a separate, dedicated thread. > > > > > > I will initiate separate threads for each of these points to allow for > > > focused discussion. Additionally, I would like to make a call for > > > contributions for anyone interested in helping with these important > > > topics. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Regards, > > > JB > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
