Sounds good, thanks. Update here (same as I added to the PR) — I’ll make 2 PRs— one for JDK 27 compile support for the workflows and a new PQC support for java25 (planned to land in October 26) targeting v6.5.0.
> On Sep 17, 2026, at 5:44 PM, Christopher Shannon > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Matt pointed out to me offline that support will be backported to JDK > 25 soon, so we can add the support for it then which is fine. > > My issue here isn't anything against PQ TLS support specifically, I > just think as a policy for the project we should not require anything > higher than the latest LTS to run a release. > > So any feature that is not in JDK 25 and only in 26-28 I think we > should wait on until JDK 29 (or unless it's backported). > > Chris > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 6:18 PM Christopher Shannon > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I commented on the PR, but I will also reiterate here in case anyone >> else wants to add to the discussion. >> >> I am -1 on adding anything that requires a non-LTS version of java to >> build. We should stick to a maximum of the current LTS for the full >> build as not everyone has the ability to install non-LTS versions and >> there are very few people that use non-LTS versions. >> >> We can target new features like this when JDK 29 is released. >> >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 7:11 AM Christopher Shannon >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I agree that it's not really something to be working on now as it's >>> going to be rare for anyone to even be running JDK 27, especially in >>> production. >>> >>> We should be focused on features for LTS releases, so this is >>> something to worry about for JDK 29. >>> >>> Chris >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 1:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I don't see this as a high priority right now. While I am fine with >>>> you working on it if you would like, I don't consider it a primary >>>> focus at this time. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> JB >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2026 at 12:23 AM Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> JDK 27 drops tomorrow, and it provides the first in-JDK support for >>>>> post-quantum encryption. >>>>> >>>>> I’ve got a PR drafted and will push it up for review. I suggest >>>>> discussion on the PR so we can capture conversation “close to the code”. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Matt Pavlovich >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact >>>> >>>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
