+1

On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 9:20 AM Eya Badal <e...@apache.org> wrote:

> Looks good to me.
> +1
>
> Checked the following:
> *Download links valid.
> *Checksums, PGP signatures valid.
> *LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files exist.
> *All files have license headers if necessary.
>
> Best regards,
> Eya
>
> On 2022/02/26 03:57:26 Alex Kwak wrote:
> > Dear Apache AGE Community,
> >
> > This is an official vote for the Apache AGE Viewer v1.0.0-rc2 that we
> have been working toward.
> >
> > To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
> >
> > Functionalities included and addressed in this release:
> > - Graph visualization for AGE.
> > - Extends edge and vertex point by point.
> > - Removed AgensGraph trademarks (as discussed in the previous vote email
> thread)
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours and pass if a majority +1 votes are
> cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
> >
> > Please vote
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache AGE Viewer v1.0.0
> > [ ] 0 I won't get in the way
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >
> >
> > The git tag to be discussed and voted upon
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/releases/tag/v1.0.0-rc2
> >
> > The git commit hash:
> > commit 63ed1882e372ef8cdf6677e9850237650e586848
> >
> > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/viewer/apache-age-viewer-1.0.0-incubating-rc2/
> >
> > The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is:
> >
> 683f17b6bfc84d9fd8c88f0856b4dd18fdb24ab429517134880594243601f6810fefe9f7d9da7d5a802e2236622974c4297cee874e0f06685e85a40d5ac90d3d
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/age/KEYS
> >
> > The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
> > 0E7F 408D 8C6A 1952 329C B379 D471 FDCE 5F5C 5B82
> >
> > For more information about the contents of this release, see:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/releases/tag/v1.0.0-rc2
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Alex Kwak
> >
>

Reply via email to