jrgemignani commented on issue #343:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/343#issuecomment-1343064068

   @TropicalPenguin @parvit I would like to note that this issue is 
**currently** being worked on (looked into), by other PMCs and committers, 
interns in this particular case. Please give them the opportunity to work on 
it. Especially, since this is a case of where functionality is missing, 
potentially due to an oversight, and that needs to be addressed. I do 
appreciate you bringing this issue to our attention!
   
   @TropicalPenguin Please hold back on submitting **bounties** for features 
that aren't implemented yet, or appear to be missed or overlooked. This is an 
area that PMCs and committers need to address and rectify, using the proper 
channels and proper procedures - many that you are not a party to. There are a 
lot of internal discussions, design decisions, and roadmaps that go into a 
feature - they take time. Plus, we don't want to have a duplication of work and 
the messiness that may cause. We don't want the **bounties** to start causing 
issues or too much noise so, let's try to find a happy medium. Do feel free to 
ask if something falls into this category. 
   
   Additionally, as a side note, SET, along with the other update commands, are 
extremely tricky to get functioning correctly due to subtle interactions and 
requirements. Think, transaction and command ids, begin/commit blocks, chained 
commands, etc. They are not trivial and there are design considerations and 
tradeoffs that we need to discuss and make. 
   
   john


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to