I am +1 for this and this is very clean and ideally nobody is going to use airavata pack right away so providing these in separate would make life easier for users to use three component separately.
Thanks Saminda for bringing this up. Lahiru On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Saminda Wijeratne <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Devs, > > Currently we have both XBaya & the Airavata services bundled together when > we create the final distribution. This can arise confusion to the users & > unnecessary overhead of retrieving/understanding/configuring for different > stakeholders. Shall we have different distributions as follows? > > > 1. Airavata server binary distribution - everything related to hosting > an Airavata Server > 2. XBaya binary distribution - everything needed for XBaya > to run independently > 3. Airavata client binary distribution - all the libraries required > for a 3rd party client to use the Airavata API > > > (This would mean that we'll have 3 binary packs for an Airavata release) > > Regards, > Saminda > -- System Analyst Programmer PTI Lab Indiana University
