I am working on changing distribution. I will work on this. Thanks Amila
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake <[email protected]> wrote: > I am +1 for this and this is very clean and ideally nobody is going to use > airavata pack right away so providing these in separate would make life > easier for users to use three component separately. > > Thanks Saminda for bringing this up. > > Lahiru > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Saminda Wijeratne <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi Devs, >> >> Currently we have both XBaya & the Airavata services bundled together when >> we create the final distribution. This can arise confusion to the users & >> unnecessary overhead of retrieving/understanding/configuring for different >> stakeholders. Shall we have different distributions as follows? >> >> >> 1. Airavata server binary distribution - everything related to hosting >> an Airavata Server >> 2. XBaya binary distribution - everything needed for XBaya >> to run independently >> 3. Airavata client binary distribution - all the libraries required >> for a 3rd party client to use the Airavata API >> >> >> (This would mean that we'll have 3 binary packs for an Airavata release) >> >> Regards, >> Saminda >> > > > > -- > System Analyst Programmer > PTI Lab > Indiana University
