I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates feasibility of the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
Thanks, Danushka On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata GSoC > projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects and a > collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think > collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got > deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to > have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really > unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it? > Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the > integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox. > > Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see a > small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all patches > in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits in last > weeks. > > Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which works > for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm > pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely, > the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test > coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard > to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements. > > Suresh > > [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv > [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy > [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013 > > On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS. > > > > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this. > > > > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look at it > too. > > > > > > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera has > written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been unsuccessful > at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques - > > > > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at all. > > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the Angular > models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to whether > a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole this > method was unsuccessful. > > > > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement) what > else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an Angular > webapp. > > > > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the > registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem > that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will > not be easy. > > > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Subho > >
