Join in at https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <[email protected] > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> +1 for the approach. >> >> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello world" >> workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect solution >> and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have a running >> workflow we can attend to imperfection and loopholes post GSOC. >> >> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ? >> > > +1 for 11 PM. > > >> >> Regards >> Sanchit Aggarwal >> MS Research (Computer Science) >> Center for Visual Information Technology >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli >> Contact - 9581417330 >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> +1 for Danushka's comments above. I too think it would be good to have >>> a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the master >>> project. If we are going to have the handout today i would like to request >>> to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from now, as >>> i have some issue in being present after that time. >>> >>> Hope to meet you all in there. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Shameera >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the >>>> way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't think >>>> it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates >>>> feasibility of the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have >>>> loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme >>>> conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when >>>> some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can >>>> revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC). >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Danushka >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata >>>>> GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects >>>>> and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think >>>>> collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got >>>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to >>>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really >>>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it? >>>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the >>>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox. >>>>> >>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see >>>>> a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all >>>>> patches >>>>> in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits in >>>>> last >>>>> weeks. >>>>> >>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which >>>>> works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the >>>>> firm >>>>> pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely, >>>>> the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test >>>>> coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard >>>>> to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements. >>>>> >>>>> Suresh >>>>> >>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv >>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy >>>>> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013 >>>>> >>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS. >>>>> > >>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this. >>>>> > >>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look >>>>> at it too. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera >>>>> has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been >>>>> unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques - >>>>> > >>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at >>>>> all. >>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the >>>>> Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down >>>>> to >>>>> whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole >>>>> this method was unsuccessful. >>>>> > >>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement) >>>>> what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an >>>>> Angular webapp. >>>>> > >>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the >>>>> registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem >>>>> that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will >>>>> not be easy. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > Cheers, >>>>> > Subho >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards, >>> Shameera Rathnayaka. >>> >>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com >>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/ >>> >> >> > > > -- > Best Regards, > Shameera Rathnayaka. > > email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com > Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/ >
