Hi Björn,

This is an issue indeed. Only picking up the files with the test_ prepended
is the default behavior. We've had this issue before:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/fe868e1cad2d1c645670f38e92d14fc8e096c6552b72edf3d9c2f94c@%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E

Deng Xiaodong fixed a couple of these issues, but apparently, there are
more files without the test_. We should enable this file and fix the broken
tests.

Cheers, Fokko

Op ma 7 jan. 2019 om 08:37 schreef Björn Pollex <
bjoern.pol...@soundcloud.com>:

> Hijacking this thread for a related problem. A couple of weeks ago I
> posted to the mailing list that some of the tests for the plugins manager
> are failing when I run them locally. Now, looking at the CI output linked
> above, it seems none of these tests is even run in CI. I have no experience
> with nose for running tests, could it be because the filename doesn’t start
> with test_? Is this intentional?
>
> Cheers,
>
>         Björn
>
> > On 6. Jan 2019, at 10:39, Tao Feng <fengta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I commit three fixes to the master branch with CI(
> >
> https://travis-ci.org/apache/airflow/builds/475904686?utm_source=github_status&utm_medium=notification
> ).
> > Most of the ORMs pass except the mysql one which fails at
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/tests/www_rbac/test_views.py#L1465
> > introduced in https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/4407.
> >
> > Not sure if it is a flaky test or a real issue.
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 9:16 PM Tao Feng <fengta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I will submit a pr to fix the test for PR # 4432 .
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 7:45 PM Deng Xiaodong <xd.den...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks Kaxil for fixing this.
> >>>
> >>> Obvious that some errors were introduced into Master branch in the last
> >>> few days during which the Travis CI was not working as expected.
> >>>
> >>> - Some of the fails were due to a logic error in `delete_dag`, which
> was
> >>> introduced into master branch in PR #4406 six days ago (
> >>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/4406, `[AIRFLOW-3599] Removed
> >>> DagBag from delete dag`).
> >>>
> >>> I already prepared a PR to fix it (
> >>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/4445 , [AIRFLOW-3635] Fix
> >>> incorrect logic in delete_dag). This fix reduces fails & errors from “8
> >>> FAILED, 2 errors” to “3 FAILED, 1 error”. Please review.
> >>>
> >>> - Other fails & errors are due to multiple reasons. One of them is that
> >>> test was not updated for PR # 4432 ([AIRFLOW-3622] Add ability to pass
> >>> hive_conf to HiveToMysqlTransfer
> >>> <
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/commit/089fa65419bb854c1422b2d1fc26cdd1ce7051e9
> >).
> >>> May anyone pick this up?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> XD
> >>>
> >>> On 5 Jan 2019, at 11:52 PM, Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> It is fixed now. I will merge that PR (
> >>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/4441) once the CI build
> finishes.
> >>>
> >>> It is now reporting error correctly. Can someone approve the PR?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 3:38 PM Naik Kaxil <k.n...@reply.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I have that in my PR but it still failed. I made another change and
> >>> triggered the CI, let's see
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Kaxil Naik
> >>>
> >>> Data Reply
> >>> Nova South
> >>> 160 Victoria Street, Westminster
> >>> London SW1E 5LB - UK
> >>> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000
> >>> k.n...@reply.com
> >>> www.reply.com
> >>>
> >>> [image: Data Reply]
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>> *From:* Deng Xiaodong <xd.den...@gmail.com>
> >>> *Sent:* Saturday, January 5, 2019 3:20:57 PM
> >>> *To:* dev@airflow.apache.org
> >>> *Cc:* Tao Feng; Driesprong, Fokko
> >>> *Subject:* Re: Travis CI reporting incorrectly
> >>>
> >>> Hi Kaxil,
> >>>
> >>> Not sure if you guys have found the root-cause. If not, I suspect it’s
> >>> because of this line “sudo ln -s ${ROOTDIR}
> >>> /home/travis/build/apache/incubator-airflow” in
> >>>
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/scripts/ci/5-run-tests.sh#L97
> >>> <
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/scripts/ci/5-run-tests.sh
> >>>> .
> >>> It was not updated accordingly in PR 4419.
> >>>
> >>> Please check.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> XD
> >>>
> >>> On 5 Jan 2019, at 11:06 PM, Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> An Example is the latest build:
> >>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/airflow/jobs/475704671#L7363
> >>>
> >>> It had "8 FAILED, 2 errors, 40 skipped (2072 tests passed)"
> >>>
> >>> But still the test show as successful.
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 1:18 PM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Sorry - I meant I think it *is* because of the renaming of the repo.
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 1:14 PM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi guys,
> >>>
> >>> Travis CI is reporting the build status incorrectly. Few of the tests
> >>> have failed but it still shows the overall test as passed.
> >>>
> >>> Request to all the committers to not merge any PR before going to
> >>>
> >>> Travis
> >>>
> >>> and checking.
> >>>
> >>> PS: I don't think it has anything to do with renaming for
> >>> incubator-airflow to airflow
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> *Kaxil Naik*
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> *Kaxil Naik*
> >>> *Big Data Consultant *@ *Data Reply UK*
> >>> *Certified *Google Cloud Data Engineer | *Certified* Apache Spark &
> >>>
> >>> Neo4j
> >>>
> >>> Developer
> >>> *Phone: *+44 (0) 74820 88992
> >>> *LinkedIn*: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kaxil
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> *Kaxil Naik*
> >>> *Big Data Consultant *@ *Data Reply UK*
> >>> *Certified *Google Cloud Data Engineer | *Certified* Apache Spark &
> Neo4j
> >>> Developer
> >>> *Phone: *+44 (0) 74820 88992
> >>> *LinkedIn*: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kaxil
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> *Kaxil Naik*
> >>> *Big Data Consultant *@ *Data Reply UK*
> >>> *Certified *Google Cloud Data Engineer | *Certified* Apache Spark &
> Neo4j
> >>> Developer
> >>> *Phone: *+44 (0) 74820 88992
> >>> *LinkedIn*: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kaxil
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
>

Reply via email to