I think we already have a stalebot. https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/3478 was closed by the stalebot for instance.
We probably can tune the stale criteria a bit to make it more aggressive. On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 2:29 PM Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote: > I think Sid had already enabled the stale bot few months back > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019, 22:12 Kamil Breguła <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019, 11:10 PM Bas Harenslak < > > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Bas > > > > > > On 17 Apr 2019, at 23:09, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected] > <mailto: > > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Principal Software Engineer > > > Phone: +48660796129 > > > > > > śr., 17 kwi 2019, 23:04 użytkownik Kevin Yang <[email protected] > <mailto: > > > [email protected]>> napisał: > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Kevin > > > > > > Daniel Imberman <[email protected]<mailto: > > > [email protected]>>于2019年4月17日 周三下午2:02写道： > > > > > > As part of our effort to reduce the PR backlog I wanted to proposed > that > > > we set the github stale action https://github.com/apps/stale. This > will > > > allow us to temporarily close PRs/tickets that are not actively being > > > worked on. > > > > > > (note that this will not remove PRs, it will simply mark PRs as stale > to > > > make it easier for committers) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Chao-Han Tsai
