Hello everyone,
it took me longer than expected, but I finally got around to making these
changes. I've moved all the issues to rightful components (except for those
lacking any component - I'll work on those afterwards).
I think I am unable to make changes to the components themselves (renames /
deletes). Fokko, or anyone in the PMC, would you be able to grant me the
privileges once more? My username is aizhamal. I'd like to do this as soon
as possible, so that I won't have to clean up issues added to components
that are to be removed.

Thanks a lot! I'll notify you on this thread once I have done the changes
to components. :)

Aizhamal

On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 2:10 PM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <aizha...@google.com>
wrote:

> Thank you for Jira powers, Fokko :) I am aiming to get it done by Monday.
>
> Regards,
> Aizhamal
>
> *From: *Driesprong, Fokko <fo...@driesprong.frl>
> *Date: *Fri, May 10, 2019 at 4:05 AM
> *To: * <dev@airflow.apache.org>
> *Cc: *Siddharth Anand, airflowuser
>
> Hi Aizhamal,
>>
>> Great suggestions. The Jira needs some love. I've added you to the
>> administrator group. Let me know if there are any issues.
>>
>> Cheers, Fokko
>>
>> Op ma 6 mei 2019 om 20:28 schreef Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy
>> <aizha...@google.com.invalid>:
>>
>> > Hello all,
>> >
>> > If it's okay by everyone, I would like to start performing the changes
>> > outlined in the doc. +Siddharth Anand <san...@apache.org> could you
>> grant
>> > me the pertinent privileges to Airflow JIRA? Once you grant me those, I
>> > will also have Bulk Change permission[1] to make those changes faster.
>> >
>> > I will perform the changes, and notify this thread once it's done.
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> > Aizhamal
>> >
>> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18338
>> >
>> > *From: *Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com>
>> > *Date: *Fri, May 3, 2019 at 5:31 AM
>> > *To: * <dev@airflow.apache.org>
>> > *Cc: *airflowuser
>> >
>> > +1 on mandatory component. +1 on mandatory version. I like the proposed
>> > > cleanup suggestions.
>> > >
>> > > According to this discussion:
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://community.atlassian.com/t5/Jira-Core-questions/Project-based-labels-in-Jira/qaq-p/101203
>> > > we
>> > > can disable labels field and create our own per-project custom field
>> with
>> > > custom values defined.
>> > >
>> > > J.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 12:04 AM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy
>> > > <aizha...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > +1 on Ash's points.
>> > > >
>> > > > is it possible to disable labels to begin with?
>> > > > > I see no great benefit in having components with labels.
>> > > > > We can do just fine with only components.
>> > > > >
>> > > > I think we need to keep the labels for searchability and
>> findability:
>> > eg.
>> > > > user creates an issue with 'redshift' label within 'aws-operators',
>> and
>> > > we
>> > > > want to allow everyone to look those issues up if they care only
>> about
>> > > > redshift. Also GSoC, GSoD, and other things that don't necessarily
>> map
>> > to
>> > > > components.
>> > > >
>> > > > I also think that the "version" field should be mandatory.
>> > > > > It's important to know against which airflow version the ticket is
>> > > > > reported.
>> > > > >
>> > > > +1 here. Users must know the version when they file a bug, and if
>> those
>> > > > bugs get fixed with newer versions, it would allow us to go back and
>> > > close
>> > > > those issues more efficiently. Any other thoughts?
>> > > >
>> > > > Best,
>> > > > Aizhamal
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> > > > > On Wednesday, May 1, 2019 12:17 PM, Ash Berlin-Taylor <
>> > a...@apache.org>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > This sounds like a fantastic idea.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I would add to the list:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > -   Remove labels that should be components (we have a gcp label
>> > and
>> > > a
>> > > > > gcp component for instance) - having duplication in them is
>> confusing
>> > > > > > -   Possibly use a label to indicate when an issue has already
>> been
>> > > > > triaged (to avoid duplicated effort)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >     We can delete components, but labels are Jira wide so apply
>> > > across
>> > > > > every ASF project so we can't do much about what appears in the
>> > > > > auto-complete. This would be the place where a Triager's Guide
>> would
>> > > come
>> > > > > in to play.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >     -ash
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On 1 May 2019, at 00:26, Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy
>> > > > > aizha...@google.com.INVALID wrote:
>> > > > > > > Hello everyone,
>> > > > > > > I would like to propose a few changes for the Apache Airflow
>> > JIRA.
>> > > > The
>> > > > > > > reason behind this proposal is that the set of components is
>> > > > > disorganized,
>> > > > > > > and it could use some improvements to track the status of the
>> > > project
>> > > > > and
>> > > > > > > improve the Jira triage.
>> > > > > > > I outlined all the proposed changes (and reasons behind) in
>> this
>> > > > > document
>> > > > > > > [1]. Please take a look and comment if you have any
>> suggestions.
>> > I
>> > > > also
>> > > > > > > created a public dashboard to to be able to look into some
>> > > statistics
>> > > > > > > around JIRA issues [2].
>> > > > > > > The high level overview of changes is:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > -
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Clean up components that are typos, duplicates or overly
>> specific
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Make component a required field when filing an issue in JIRA
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Give a component to all issues that don’t have one at the
>> moment
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Ensure that no new components are created unless it’s
>> discussed
>> > by
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > > community
>> > > > > > > For further details, please take a look at the doc[1], and
>> share
>> > > your
>> > > > > > > thoughts on it.
>> > > > > > > Thank you,
>> > > > > > > Aizhamal
>> > > > > > > [1]
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gticSJ7LgD15XHgQhEP78-Ky38Er_NnMlarIvSQ8NYM/edit?usp=sharing
>> > > > > > > [2]
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333933
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > >
>> > > Jarek Potiuk
>> > > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
>> > >
>> > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
>> > > E: jarek.pot...@polidea.com
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to