+1 (binding)

On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 10:40 PM Kamil Breguła <kamil.breg...@polidea.com>
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 10:29 PM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 2:36 AM Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ah sorry. Earlier edits. Disregard this half-sentence please:
> > > Packages will only
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 8:14 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > "1. Packages are split "per provider". Packages will only"
> > > >
> > > > Unfinished line there?
> > > >
> > > > On 6 March 2020 14:07:10 GMT-05:00, Jarek Potiuk <
> > > jarek.pot...@polidea.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hello everyone,
> > > >>
> > > >> This is a second attempt for voting on Backport package release
> process.
> > > >>
> > > >> This is just voting on the process itself, not on the release of the
> > > >> packages - we did not do it before so we have no process yet  - so I
> > > >> would like to agree on that first.  The discussion was not very
> active
> > > >> but i think the proposal below addresses all concerns people had so
> > > >> far.
> > > >>
> > > >> The voting will last till Tuesday 10 March 8 pm CET. All committers
> > > >> have a binding vote.
> > > >>
> > > >> My proposal for vote:
> > > >>
> > > >> 1. Packages are split "per provider". Packages will only
> > > >> 2. Whenever there are cross-package dependencies they are available
> as
> > > >> "extras".  It is automatically derived from the code - no need to
> > > >> maintain it or change existing code.
> > > >> 3. The packages are testable using system tests and released only
> when
> > > >> system tests pass for those on the latest Airflow version (1.10.9
> > > >> currently) and 3.6 Python version. This is on top of the unit tests
> > > >> running in master already.
> > > >> 4. The packages will be released with CALVER versioning 2020.03.06 .
> > > >> Likely in batches after testing is completed.
> > > >> 5. Status of testing of the packages will be updated in our wiki
> page
> > > >>
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Backported+providers+packages+for+Airflow+1.10.*+series
> > > >> 6. I will be coordinating an effort to add system tests and test the
> > > >> packages for as many providers as possible and try to get people
> > > >> interested in it.
> > > >> 7. In the future we will automate such tests providing that we agree
> > > >> on it - separate voting on "AIP-4 Support for Automation of System
> > > >> Tests for external systems"
> > > >>
> > > >> This is my (binding) +1 vote on it.
> > > >>
> > > >> More information:
> > > >>
> > > >> The current list of providers is available here:
> > > >>
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7506/files#diff-337e7c8a1a7c5e1e9be3c5d8063d7d4cR81
> > > >>
> > > >> The current list of cross-dependencies (extras) is available here.
> > > >>
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7506/files#diff-ea1f65a8eaac0cec7ae151dfdbbbc587R355
> > > >>
> > > >> The proposal was discussed in this thread:
> > > >>
> > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf6f2de8056b00ad084c96a9428670c14421a89ba2bbbd362d833bb50%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
> > > >>
> > > >> I have a PR that implements "extras" approach for cross-package
> > > >> dependencies here: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7506
> > > >>
> > > >> Related discussion about AIP-4 (Automation of system tests) is here:
> > > >>
> > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8c37e2289e8c8b438acc1415e9f2a1b74cd6feac831e02a17b01d88d%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Jarek Potiuk
> > > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
> > >
> > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
> > > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
> > >
>


-- 

Tomasz Urbaszek
Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Software Engineer

M: +48 505 628 493 <+48505628493>
E: tomasz.urbas...@polidea.com <tomasz.urbasz...@polidea.com>

Unique Tech
Check out our projects! <https://www.polidea.com/our-work>

Reply via email to