Hi all, This email calls for a vote on the design proposed in AIP-15, found here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=103092651 A few notes - The proposed architecture is to use an active/active architecture where each scheduler is fully capable - Nothing in this proposal locks us in to this design long term, and if we find it doesn't work or scale we can change it. - Lock contention doesn't worry me, as we (plan to) skip locked rows, meaning that when one scheduler has a DAG locked it will be skipped over by other schedulers This vote will last for 72 hours until 2020-03-20T21:40Z, and until at least 3 votes have been cast. This is my +1 vote. Thanks, Ash
