Thank you Ash. +1 and stamped.
Cheers, Kevin Y On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 2:46 PM Deng Xiaodong <xd.den...@gmail.com> wrote: > Appreciate your effort, Ash. And a +1 for this. > > > XD > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 23:31 Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I have just opened a PR to rename the few of the remaining instances of > > whitelist or blacklist in our code base. (There weren't many.) There are > > some we can't remove yet (because they are modules/classes/config from > > external modules. I have opened issues in those projects for most of > them) > > > > It's fairly common to say whitelisting and blacklisting to describe > > desirable and undesirable things in cyber security. Just because > > it is common doesn't mean it's right. > > > > However, there's an issue with the terminology. It only makes sense if > > you equate white with 'good, permitted, safe' and black with 'bad, > > dangerous, forbidden'. There are some obvious problems with this. > > > > You may not see why this matters. If you're not adversely affected by > > racial stereotyping yourself, then please count yourself lucky. For some > > of your friends and colleagues (and potential future colleagues), this > > really is a change worth making. > > > > From now on, we will use 'allow list' and 'deny list' in place of > > 'whitelist' and 'blacklist' wherever possible. Which, in fact, is > > clearer and less ambiguous. So as well as being more inclusive of all, > > this is a net benefit to our understandability. > > > > (Words mostly borrowed from > > https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/blog-post/terminology-its-not-black-and-white) > > > > And to reaffirm the trailer from that blog post: If you’re thinking > > about getting in touch saying "this is political correctness gone mad", > or > > "what's the big deal", don’t bother. If that is your view then you are > > not welcome in this community. > > > > The PR is https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9174 > > > > -ash > > >
