+1 On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 7:12 PM Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yeah I agree and looks like Paola and Elad have already volunteered to help > triage. > > Regards, > Kaxil > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020, 18:09 Tomasz Urbaszek <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > The main reason I suggested the stale bot was the lack of any > > widespread prioritization/reviewing of issues which results in big > > pile of never addresses issues. > > > > I think that triage access is a better answer to this problem as > > engaging more people will help us all. I'm +1 for that. > > > > Cheers, > > Tomek > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 5:00 PM Paola Peraza Calderon > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Paola here from Astronomer. I've been working at Astro since our early > > days in both Customer and Product-centric roles and have of course been > > closely following all-things Airflow for a long time. > > > > > > I happened to read this conversation around GH Issue management and > > figure I can step up to volunteer as someone familiar with the project + > > Product Ops principles, if that'd be helpful. I could always start by: > > > > > > - Cleaning up/commenting on duplicate issues (or close given the right > > permissions) > > > - Commenting on stale issues and investigate whether they're still a > > problem or already addressed > > > - Asking questions as needed if issues need clarification or additional > > scoping > > > > > > If this would be helpful, I'm more than happy to get involved and pick > > at these over time. It'll likely be a journey that never ends, but I > think > > a compelling need to keep the community momentum going. Let me know - and > > great to meet you all. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Paola > > > > > > On 2020/09/10 11:56:22, Tomasz Urbaszek <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Currently, we have about 582 open issues on Github. The oldest opened > > > > in March. Do you think we should consider using stale bot as we do > for > > > > PRs? > > > > > > > > I don't think that issue that is open since March is "so important" > to > > > > keep it still open. This would also automate the process of verifying > > > > the issue (the author will be notified and asked for an update). If > > > > the issue is something that we want to keep open we should be able to > > > > use the "pinned" label. > > > > > > > > Other projects use it and I don't see anything wrong with it. I would > > > > say that 30d is a good period for keeping an issue open. > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > Bests, > > > > Tomek > > > > > > > -- Jarek Potiuk Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
