Github Discussions have now been enabled: https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions/.
I have created a PR to direct Users to Github Discussions instead of Slack for asking questions so they are indexed: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11940 Regards, Kaxil On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 8:16 PM Ry Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > I+1 > > It’s hard to be subscribed to both dev@ and users@ (so. much. email.), > and you’d need devs subscribed to both for users to have a good experience, > to get their questions well-answered. > > I unsubscribed from users@ and now that is invisible to me - good for my > focus, bad for the users. > > A majority of Airflow users would know GitHub and have an account, and it > would be convenient to the devs if most questions were asked there, rather > than on users@ or slack - because: > > - We’re already in GitHub reviewing PRs and issues > - the q&a would have a permalink, and be indexed in search engines better > (reduce repeated questions) > - It’s be worthwhile to write better questions and write better answers > there vs on an ephemeral mailing list or slack thread > > This change would enhance UX for both devs and users. > > -Ry > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 3:00 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm with Aizhamal, though slightly stronger at -0.5. >> >> -ash >> >> On Sep 25 2020, at 7:37 pm, Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> -0 binding, because we never really promoted the user list in airflow (it >> was set up relatively late) and never made a clear distinction between >> user/dev lists. But I see the convenience it brings to developers, though >> there is a potential to lock out users who are not familiar with GitHub. >> >> Also, we must add code of conduct with the PR and update the website with >> the info of where user questions need to be directed. >> >> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 9:34 AM Maxime Beauchemin < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:40 PM Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> @tomek - Yup we could do that >> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:35 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> +1 binding >> >> Should we change "Ask a question or get support" issue type to point >> to GH discussion? >> >> T. >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 9:15 PM Austin Bennett >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > just make sure to appropriate self-police, to keep use for intended >> purposes. >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:05 PM Deng Xiaodong <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> +1. >> >> >> >> I did share some concerns with folks, but I think mostly already >> clarified well in the earlier discussion. >> >> >> >> >> >> XD >> >> >> >> On 22 Sep 2020, at 9:00 PM, Daniel Imberman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> via Newton Mail >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:59 AM, Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> This email calls for a vote to enable Github Discussion on Apache >> Airflow repo. >> >> >> >> Intended Use: >> >> A forum for users, you might consider it as a replacement of >> [email protected]. >> >> >> >> Caveats: >> >> >> >> GitHub discussion is NOT to be used for anything other than user help. >> As is the policy of the ASF Foundation, all code-related discussions and >> project management activities MUST be reflected to an ASF mailing list ( >> [email protected]). >> >> >> >> >> >> Discussion Thread: >> >> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb8c12f0a9f2be43eeab8036104c4799eb645ebed3920b390dc61b76%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E >> >> >> >> Consider this my +1 binding >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Kaxil >> >> >> >> >> >> -- > Sent from Gmail Mobile >
