Thanks Kaxil and everyone who contributes!

+1 (binding).
Tested with Python 3.6/Postgres/LocalExecutor.


XD

On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 1:36 PM Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote:

> A kind reminder to test 2.0.1rc2.
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 9:32 PM Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello Airflow community,
>>
>> This is a call for the vote to release Apache Airflow version 2.0.1 from
>> 2.0.1rc2.
>>
>> The release candidate:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/2.0.1rc2/
>>
>> *apache-airflow-2.0.1rc2-source.tar.gz* is a source release that comes
>> with INSTALL instructions.
>> *apache-airflow-2.0.1rc2-bin.tar.gz* is the binary Python "sdist"
>> snapshot.
>> *apache_airflow-2.0.1rc2-py3-none-any.whl* is a Python wheel "binary"
>> release
>>
>> Public keys are available at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
>>
>> Changelog: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/2.0.1rc2/CHANGELOG.txt
>>
>> For convenience, RC is also uploaded on PyPI so you can install it using
>> *pip install apache-airflow==2.0.1rc2*
>>
>> The vote will run for *4 days*, until 2021-02-08T21:30:00Z
>> <https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=8&iso=20210208T1930&p1=1440>
>>  (or
>> until 3 +1 binding votes have been received)
>>
>> Release Time (World Clock):
>> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=8&iso=20210208T2130&p1=1440
>> Countdown Timer:
>> https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to?iso=20210208T2130&p0=136&font=cursive
>>
>> Consider this my +1 binding vote
>>
>> Please vote accordingly:
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>
>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but the release manager should
>> encourage members of the community
>> to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>>
>> The test procedure for PMCs and Contributors who would like to test this
>> RC are described in
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/2.0.1rc1/dev/README_RELEASE_AIRFLOW.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmcs
>>
>> Please note that the version number excludes the `rcX` string, so it's
>> now simply 2.0.1. This will allow us to rename the artifact without
>> modifying the artifact checksums when we actually release.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kaxil
>>
>

Reply via email to