It is great! I've just added to my bookmarks.

Thanks Tomek!

BR Tobiasz

wt., 23 lut 2021 o 10:11 Tomasz Urbaszek <[email protected]> napisał(a):

> Hello all,
>
> As promised I created the publication:
> https://medium.com/apache-airflow
>
> If you know some articles that we can add to the publication - let me
> know, here or on #blogposts channel on Airflow slack.
>
> Committers - if you are interested in being editor, please provide (can be
> via slack) your medium ids so I can add you.
>
> Cheers,
> Tomek
>
> On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 at 13:51, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> After  the change in October - they only require registration if you want
>> to read the "Partner" blog post where the partner wants to earn money. They
>> realised how damaging the previous approach was and withdrew.
>>
>> And yeah we can support both. ASF and Apache 2.0 are commercially
>> friendly and I believe this is part of their success :). I am personally
>> not a big fan of copy-left licenses - not everyone has to be open-source.
>> It's great if they do, but this is not the only business model.
>> If Medium wants to make money on free stuff - this is great as long as
>> free articles are free. I am happy they found a way to build a business
>> model that works for them and at the same time people who want to share
>> for free can do it without obligations and limitation of their readership.
>> My personal opinion is that earning money is a good thing (if you are not
>> exploiting others). They can employ people and pay them, and they pay taxes
>> eventually. While I think their previous model when they chose which
>> articles were put behind paywall was a bad idea (and I withdrew my
>> subscription when they introduced it), they realised that and changed back
>> to be good citizens (mainly because they saw how damaging it is to them I
>> believe).
>>
>> And I think Medium's reach, popularity and discoverability (and position
>> in search engines) are far bigger than dev.to.
>>
>> I believe there is nothing wrong with promoting both and let the author's
>> choose which "medium" (!) they choose rather than force them to use one. We
>> can add others as well (if we find there are other popular ones) - the
>> more, the merrier. It costs us nothing but a short discussion :)
>>
>> J.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 1:22 PM Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> One last thing (i promise) is that dev.to is powered by
>>> OpenSource. They Open Sourced their software called
>>> <https://github.com/forem/forem>
>>> Forem <https://github.com/forem/forem>. Since this is Open Source well
>>> ^^
>>>
>>> Kind Regards,
>>>
>>> Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
>>> about <https://compileralchemy.github.io/> | blog
>>> <https://www.pythonkitchen.com>
>>> github <https://github.com/Abdur-RahmaanJ>
>>> Mauritius
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> +48 660 796 129
>>
>

Reply via email to