+1 binding. It will make it better for a class of uses. On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Xinbin Huang <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 non-binding. Looking forward to it! > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:00 PM Ry Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 binding - great work on this so far! >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:43 PM James Timmins <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hey team, >>> >>> This email calls a vote to accept AIP-39: >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-39+Richer+scheduler_interval >>> >>> Discussion thread: >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf8eeb06493681f48dc9e82ce605a9c3a930cfee0b4ca19462a4e55b3%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E >>> >>> There is some on-going discussion about the best name for the classes, >>> but it is agreed that this can be decided (and changed) at any point up >>> until when this feature is released. (As we have done previously with >>> Functional DAGs -> TaskFlow API). >>> >>> This vote will last for 4 days until 2021-03-23 23:50 UTC, and until 3 >>> binding votes have been cast. >>> >>> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=AIP-39+Voting+Deadline&iso=20210323T1650&p1=137 >>> >>> Consider this my +1 (binding). Reminder: committer and PMC votes are >>> both binding on AIP votes. All community members are encouraged to vote. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> James Timmins and Ash Berlin-Taylor >>> >> -- >> Sent from Gmail Mobile >> > -- +48 660 796 129
