I look forward to seeing these propsals etc.

One thought I've just had is that we should be careful about two things when taking on this work:

1. That performance is not impacted (specifically of the scheduler "throughput") -- at least when only a single "tenant" is in use if not for all. 2. That we don't make the deployment story more complex for the small deployments, nor for the "getting started on a laptop" initial user experience.

-ash

On Fri, Nov 26 2021 at 18:23:32 +0100, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
Recording available here:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Irw7qxxeTOHZTfdvT5lAbGowIfm9DHzi/view>

On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 6:17 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

 Thanks for the meeting this morning/afternoon :) ! It was very
 productive, I believe:

 The notes are available here:
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/19d0jQeARnWm8VTVc_qSIEDldQ81acRk0KuhVwAd96wo/edit>

 The most important take is that it looks like if the use cases are
 slightly different, we are all aligned of what needs to be done and
 how

 Action points:

* Composer team (Mateusz) will soon submit AIP's (they are close to be
 ready for proposing) for
    * DB access isolation
    * Separating out DAG processor
 * Cloudera team (Ian) will work on follow-up Fine-grained resource
 access AIP - it can be implemented as next steps. The two AIPs above
 will implement "coarse" access level but in the way that the
 "fine-grained" access will be possible to be plugged-in

I recorded the meeting and I am waiting for the video to be processed
 - I will send/add it to notes when I get it.

 J.





 J.

On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 2:29 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
 >
 > Reminder: the SIG meeting is today in ~2.5 hrs.
 >
 > Calendar link here:
> <https://calendar.google.com/event?action=TEMPLATE&tmeid=N3ZmbGFxNGF1OXBtajc2ODU3bWduMWVvc2YgcG90aXVrLmFwYWNoZS5vcmdAbQ&tmsrc=potiuk.apache.org%40gmail.com>
 > Notes/material links will be added here
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/19d0jQeARnWm8VTVc_qSIEDldQ81acRk0KuhVwAd96wo/edit?usp=sharing>
 >
> I will record the meeting and post the link together with the notes.
 >
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:31 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
 > >
> > Just a reminder -> multi-tenancy meeting tomorrow. Few people worked > > on what will be presented tomorrow, and I am super excited we will be > > able to kick that one off - it has been a long time on my waiting list
 > > :)
 > >
 > > J.
 > >
> > On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 10:14 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
 > > >
 > > > The meeting is set for Friday 26th Nov 5 PM CET (4 PM UTC)
 > > >
 > > > This is the calendar link (google meet link there):
> > > <https://calendar.google.com/event?action=TEMPLATE&tmeid=N3ZmbGFxNGF1OXBtajc2ODU3bWduMWVvc2YgcG90aXVrLmFwYWNoZS5vcmdAbQ&tmsrc=potiuk.apache.org%40gmail.com>
 > > >
 > > > The initial agenda:
 > > >
> > > 1) The goal of the group, intro about the "isolation" and various "scopes"
 > > > of the multi-tenancy - Jarek Potiuk
 > > >
 > > > 2) The review of the example architecture that
> > > needs the "multitenancy" - this is from the Google Composer team -
 > > > Mateusz Henc
 > > >
 > > > 3) Maybe others would like to get their case explain similarly
 > > >
> > > 4) Discus proposals on the scope of the AIP(s) we want to write > > > and rough approach we can take for implementation and who will do
 > > > whatGoogle Meet call: meet.google.com/rxu-tvdz-vpv (edited)
 > > >
> > > We will send more info/slides then. Anyone who would like to show/add
 > > > something, please respond here :).
 > > >
 > > > J.

Reply via email to