Cancelling the vote then
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 4:55 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > THanks Kaxil! good catch! > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > -1 for Databricks provider. The change in > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19835 causes DB call in init (which > > was fixed in last version). Josh Fell will have a PR in a bit to fix it > > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 8:51 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hey all, > >> > >> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > >> calling a vote on the release, > >> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on Fri 10 > >> Dec 09:47:36 CET 2021. > >> > >> Consider this my (binding) +1. > >> > >> This is RC2 of databricks provider (removed from rc1 series due to a > >> bug discovered) > >> > >> Airflow Providers are available at: > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/ > >> > >> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary > >> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the > >> provider packages. > >> > >> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary > >> Python "wheel" release. > >> > >> The test procedure for PMC members who would like to test the RC > >> candidates are described in > >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-by-pmc-members > >> > >> and for Contributors: > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-by-contributors > >> > >> > >> Public keys are available at: > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS > >> > >> Please vote accordingly: > >> > >> [ ] +1 approve > >> [ ] +0 no opinion > >> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > >> > >> > >> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are > >> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". > >> > >> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. > >> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying > >> the artifact checksums when we actually release. > >> > >> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here: > >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20097 > >> > >> You can find packages as well as detailed changelog following the below > >> links: > >> > >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/2.1.0rc2 > >> > >> Cheers, > >> J,
