+1 binding

On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 6:08 PM Elad Kalif <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 6:31 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> One more vote please :)
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 2:25 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 binding
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 13 2021 at 23:40:14 +0100, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Kind reminder - it's already well tested (thanks Alex!) so we just need
>> two PMC votes for tomorrow's release. J. On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 5:31 PM
>> Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hey all, I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This
>> email is calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours -
>> which means that it will end on Tue 14 Dec 17:27:59 CET 2021. Consider this
>> my (binding) +1. This is only a databricks RC3 provider (thanks Josh for
>> fixing the DB problem with RC2). Airflow Providers are available at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
>> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary Python
>> "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the provider
>> packages. *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary Python
>> "wheel" release. The test procedure for PMC members who would like to test
>> the RC candidates are described in
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-by-pmc-members
>> and for Contributors:
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-by-contributors
>> Public keys are available at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS Please vote
>> accordingly: [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove with the
>> reason Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the
>> community are encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. This will
>> allow us to rename the artifact without modifying the artifact checksums
>> when we actually release. The status of testing the providers by the
>> community is kept here: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20220
>> You can find packages as well as detailed changelog following the below
>> links:
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/2.1.0rc3/
>> Cheers, J.
>>
>

Reply via email to