@dstandish.- Yeah - callback is a bit too "invasive". I thought about it but at least some examples use default_args and adding "callback" there would mix the concerns and make it difficult to extract parts of the examples in our documentation.
@ash - yeah. I realized that when you posted it that the >> will work in this case only because of the sequence of processing of the operator :). I have not thought about it before, but when you posted it, it was kinda obvious :). It is a bit "implicit" and probably I would not rely on this behaviour elsewhere, but it actually plays very well with the use-case of system tests. J. On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 8:08 PM Daniel Standish <[email protected]> wrote: > The other thing that comes to mind is you can add your "normal" tasks to > a task group and then do `my_group >> watcher` > > Also I noticed that dag can take success / failure callbacks. Maybe the > "watcher" task makes sense as a callback. > >
