Hello again!

The voting time has nearly passed the half of the expected duration (end on
Monday 21st Feb 9AM CET) and we have a weekend ahead.

The current state is:
[ ] 1/3 required binding votes,
[ ] 4 non-binding votes.

Please consider voting for this AIP-47 if you feel it'd be beneficial for
the community :)
Have a nice weekend!

Kind regards,
Mateusz Nojek


czw., 17 lut 2022 o 08:41 Łukasz Wyszomirski <[email protected]>
napisał(a):

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 19:00, Mars Group <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding) This is a really tight proposal.
>>
>> Forest Mars
>> --
>>
>> On Feb 16, 2022, at 12:52 PM, Eugen Kosteev <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> +1 (non-binding) I am very excited to have it implemented! +1 for the
>> idea of self-contained DAGs as system tests.
>>
>> On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 16:00, Bartłomiej Hirsz <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> śr., 16 lut 2022, 13:03 użytkownik Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
>>> napisał:
>>>
>>>> +1 (binding). I really like the idea of "one source file for
>>>> everything".
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 8:26 AM Mateusz Nojek <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello there,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to call for a vote on AIP-47 "New design of Airflow
>>>>> System Tests":
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-47+New+design+of+Airflow+System+Tests
>>>>>
>>>>> Discussion thread:
>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/htd4013yn483qfhwv11vc26jpf2yvjph
>>>>>
>>>>> The voting will last for 5 days (until 21st February 2022 9:00 CET),
>>>>> and until at least 3 binding votes have been cast.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote accordingly:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] + 1 approve
>>>>> [ ] + 0 no opinion
>>>>> [ ] - 1 disapprove with the reason
>>>>>
>>>>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
>>>>> are encouraged to check the new design and vote with "(non-binding)".
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>> Mateusz Nojek
>>>>>
>>>> --
>> Eugene
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> -------------------------------
> Pozdrawiam
> Łukasz Wyszomirski
>

Reply via email to