Seems there are no objections I will proceed to merge the PR. On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 1:36 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey All, > > Calling for lazy consensus on the policy for providers support for > Airflow versions. If there are no "opposition" to it - I will merge it on > Thursday. > > I discussed it in > https://lists.apache.org/thread/csczm7xmnntdz9wtjbod8pqgt13zoggo and > propose > > The PR proposal is here: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/21696 > > ## Support for providers > > Providers released by the community have limitation of a minimum supported > version of Airflow. The minimum version of Airflow is the `MINOR` version > (2.1, 2.2 etc.) indicating that the providers might use features that > appeared in this release. The default support timespan for the minimum > version of Airflow (there could be justified exceptions) is that we > increase the minimum Airflow version, when 12 months passed since the first > release for the MINOR version of Airflow. > > For example this means that by default we upgrade the minimum version of > Airflow supported by providers to 2.2.0 in the first Provider's release > after 21st of May 2022 (21st of May 2021 is the date when the first > `PATCHLEVEL` of 2.1 (2.1.0) has been released. > > J > >
