Hey all, I think this workflow we have in CI is rather useless now. It has been somewhat useful at some point in the past when we tried to automate CI checks and see if we can get more info if the PR needs more thorough check (i.e. whether it touches core airflow, or whether it requires "full tests" but there are few problems:
* it introduces a lot of noise * it's not 100% foolproof - there are both false positives and false negatives * we can (and sometimes do) manually set the "full test needed" label for PRs that need more "thorough" CI check before merge I personally see that as mostly noise for quite some time now and I see no value in it. Anyone disagree? Should we remove it ? J.
