So far, seems all in favor. I will just highlight, in case it's not clear.... when we release this (presumably 2.4), basically every single dag in existence will start emitting deprecation warnings, and prior to 3.0, basically every dag in existence will need to be updated.
Thankfully, for most people, this should be an easy update since DAG is kwargs only, IIRC. On Fri, Jul 29, 2022, 2:27 PM Brent Bovenzi <br...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > +1 to consolidating and "schedule". > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2022, 10:12 PM Drew Hubl <drew.h...@astronomer.io.invalid> > wrote: > >> +1 for ‘schedule', and another +1 to the importance of consolidating to >> one being more important than the name of that one >> >> On Jul 29, 2022, at 1:58 PM, Josh Fell <josh.d.f...@astronomer.io.INVALID> >> wrote: >> >> Consolidating to a single scheduling parameter is a big +1 from me. >> `schedule` seems like a nice catch-all. >> >> On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 9:10 AM Jed Cunningham <jedcunning...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 on moving to a single `schedule` param. >>> >> >>
