If I can vote twice it would be for: 25610 and 25888.

Hard to choose between them, they are both really good and critical


On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 10:00 AM Jeambrun Pierre <pierrejb...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I really love the new graph view for the datasets.
>
> My vote goes to 25707.
>
> Best,
> Pierre
>
> On Wed 31 Aug 2022 at 15:47, Constance Martineau
> <consta...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Mine is 25888 :) The docker-compose warnings were really off-putting and
>> unfriendly. If someone is evaluating a new tool, Quick Starts are one of
>> the first places they go to and it's a bad first impression. Prioritizing
>> Airflow Standalone is a huge improvement.
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 9:30 AM Collin McNulty
>> <col...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> I vote for 25610.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 7:12 AM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have a tied vote for [25610] and [25888]. 0.5 each :)
>>>>
>>>> [*25610*] Grid logs for mapped instances and *[25888] *Prefer the
>>>> local Quick Start in docs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 at 14:38, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> [25888] Prefer the local Quick Start in docs
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/25888
>>>>>
>>>>> Why ?
>>>>>
>>>>> I think this is a step in the right direction when it comes to
>>>>> communication with our users.
>>>>>
>>>>> With this one, we start to analyse how users are looking at our docs
>>>>> (this change was driven by our doc page analytics). But it's a bit more
>>>>> than that - we also deliberately engineer their "experience" (especially
>>>>> for the first-time users this time).
>>>>> We simply start to use docs as deliberate guidance where we would like
>>>>> to lead our users and take into account the "uses" of Airflow that we want
>>>>> to promote.
>>>>>
>>>>> We need more of those and more deliberate rather than accidental doc
>>>>> decisions.
>>>>>
>>>>> J.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 3:20 PM Michael Robinson
>>>>> <michael.robin...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey devlist!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It’s time again to select a PR of the Month for the Airflow
>>>>>> newsletter. The candidate PRs below have been selected using the
>>>>>> `get_important_pr_candidates.py` script in airflow/dev/stats, which we’re
>>>>>> continuing to tweak. (Most recently, we added comments and reactions in
>>>>>> linked issues to the score calculation.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote by selecting the most important, interesting, or
>>>>>> impactful PR from the list below (or an entirely new one!) and replying
>>>>>> with the number. Voting will close on 8/31 at 6:15 AM PT.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [25509] Possibility to document DAG with a separated Markdown file
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/25509
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [25888] Prefer the local Quick Start in docs
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/25888
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [25788] Properly check the existence of missing mapped TIs
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/25788
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [25610] Grid logs for mapped instances
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/25610
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [25857] Add `RedshiftCreateClusterSnapshotOperator`
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/25857
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>
>>> Collin McNulty
>>> Lead Airflow Engineer
>>>
>>> Email: col...@astronomer.io <john....@astronomer.io>
>>> Time zone: US Central (CST UTC-6 / CDT UTC-5)
>>>
>>>
>>> <https://www.astronomer.io/>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Constance Martineau
>> Product Manager
>>
>> Email: consta...@astronomer.io
>> Time zone: US Eastern (EST UTC-5 / EDT UTC-4)
>>
>>
>> <https://www.astronomer.io/>
>>
>>

Reply via email to