+1 non binding our astronomer-providers and astro-sdk DAG'S ran fine on the RC's.
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 6:02 PM Phani Kumar <phani.ku...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > +1 non binding > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 2:25 PM Pankaj Koti > <pankaj.k...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > > > +1 non-binding > > > > We tested the following 7 RCs on our example DAGs. > > 1. https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/8.0.0rc1/ > > 2. > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/6.1.0rc1/ > > 3. > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/4.1.0rc1/ > > 4. https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-dbt-cloud/3.1.1rc1/ > > 5. https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/10.0.0rc1/ > > 6. > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/6.0.0rc1/ > > 7. https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/4.0.5rc1/ > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Pankaj Koti > > > > *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team. > > Location: Pune, India > > > > Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST) > > > > Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io > > > > Mobile: +91 9730079985 > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 12:24 AM Jed Cunningham < > jedcunning...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Checked signatures, checksums, licences. > > > > > >
