+1 (non binding) with preference of PR #33351 over #33353 as hotfix

Sent from Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2023 7:50:23 PM
To: dev@airflow.apache.org <dev@airflow.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Restore dag_run.conf UI triggering option for 2.7.0

Tuesday 10am 15th (!) of August, 2023 of course, not 26th. That would be
quite a delay.

On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 7:48 PM Hussein Awala <huss...@awala.fr> wrote:

> Thank you Jarek for raising this vote.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 7:39 PM Pankaj Koti
> <pankaj.k...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Sat, 12 Aug 2023, 23:06 Jarek Potiuk, <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > I would like to raise a vote about modifying the result of vote from
> > > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2F4dkbwob1wyl3xjbqdsmbd1mvgzflzp1f&data=05%7C01%7CJens.Scheffler%40de.bosch.com%7C9dcfa7a69f144424df3a08db9b5ca591%7C0ae51e1907c84e4bbb6d648ee58410f4%7C0%7C0%7C638274594441113976%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=zYGN8y6l4xgG%2BBJCqh1CAc1Q6ZZmg7iJHhMDVwplWn0%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.apache.org/thread/4dkbwob1wyl3xjbqdsmbd1mvgzflzp1f>.
> > >  and
> > > RESTORE dagrun.conf UI option for triggering DAGs in 2.7.0 (which means
> > > preparing RC2).
> > >
> > > I am writing that in the name of the release-management "concilium":
> > > Ephraim, Hussein, Elad, Jens, Pankaj Koti, Rahul Vats, myself
> > >
> > > We discussed it today at the #release-management channel about the
> > problem
> > > with dagrun.conf functionality removal from 2.7.0 "Trigger UI".
> > >
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapache-airflow.slack.com%2Farchives%2FC03G9H97MM2%2Fp1691833923538419&data=05%7C01%7CJens.Scheffler%40de.bosch.com%7C9dcfa7a69f144424df3a08db9b5ca591%7C0ae51e1907c84e4bbb6d648ee58410f4%7C0%7C0%7C638274594441113976%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=0ndQwXfl3h%2FSnCpj6ll6DBZjNUUs9M9GK6m3t%2FtHnvk%3D&reserved=0<https://apache-airflow.slack.com/archives/C03G9H97MM2/p1691833923538419>
> > .
> > > It's been also raised as concern by Hussein in the original PR and the
> > > [VOTE] thread for 2.7.0rc1
> > > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2Fpc89dh43kmpj267rpospo1lk5j3j6qkl&data=05%7C01%7CJens.Scheffler%40de.bosch.com%7C9dcfa7a69f144424df3a08db9b5ca591%7C0ae51e1907c84e4bbb6d648ee58410f4%7C0%7C0%7C638274594441113976%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=nTYMjQNh6B1Cs%2BxOuvNpsbtN8l9fmLTV8se5rfundeQ%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.apache.org/thread/pc89dh43kmpj267rpospo1lk5j3j6qkl>
> > >  .
> > >
> > > I think we all unanimously agree that removal of that functionality is
> > > practically breaking change for many of our users, who will have no
> > choice
> > > but to modify their DAGs and add param definitions to their DAGs if
> they
> > > want to continue triggering their DAGs via UI.
> > >
> > > While it is a good thing to do and this was the original intention,
> > > to "push" our users in this direction, we realised that we do not give
> > the
> > > users a viable alternative and that effort required to rewrite their
> DAGs
> > > might be far too much and might be a huge blocker to 2.7 adoption. The
> > > "push" seems to be rather brutal and forceful, not a gentle one.
> > >
> > > We did not realise this consequence when we - as a community -  ran the
> > > previous vote, but we now think releasing 2.7.0 without this option
> will
> > > cause a lot of problems.
> > >
> > > Since we all share such a unanimous view,  we propose (and Ephraim is
> > going
> > > to do so) cancel RC1 and Jens already has PRs that should restore the
> > > functionality. PR is shortly coming.
> > >
> > > However, that requires modifying the results of the previous vote.
> > >
> > > Consider that my binding +1 vote.
> > >
> > > We want to accelerate the voting a bit and we also propose to produce
> an
> > > RC2 with the option restored to accelerate the process and not to delay
> > the
> > > 2.7.0 release too much. I propose this vote to last till 10 am Tuesday
> > 26th
> > > CEST  - that should give enough time for everyone including the weekend
> > > time.
> > >
> > > J.
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to