+1 non binding

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 5:03 PM Amogh Desai <amoghdesai....@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 non binding
>
> Tested with a few dags from my test set. No regression from the last RC.
>
> Thanks,
> Amogh Desai
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023, 15:19 Pankaj Koti <pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
> .invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Our astronomer-providers (async) DBT DAG based on the provider RC2 ran
> > fine.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Pankaj Koti
> >
> > *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
> > Location: Pune, India
> >
> > Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
> >
> > Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
> >
> > Mobile: +91 9730079985
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 5:01 AM Josh Fell <josh.d.f...@astronomer.io
> > .invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Ran a few example DAGs. Everything looks good async and otherwise.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 5:37 PM Hussein Awala <huss...@awala.fr>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (binding) - checked my changes and they are present in the RC.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 11:33 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding) - checked signatures, checksums, licences, sources
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 12:19 PM Elad Kalif <elad...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hey all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have just cut the *RC2* for dbt.cloud provider. This email is
> > > > calling a
> > > > > > vote on the release,
> > > > > > which will last for 24 hours - which means that it will end on
> > > > September
> > > > > > 13, 2023 10:15 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been
> > > received.
> > > > > Vote
> > > > > > duration is according to shortened voting period policy as
> accepted
> > > in
> > > > > this
> > > > > > thread <
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/cv194w1fqqykrhswhmm54zy9gnnv6kgm
> > > > > >.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Airflow Providers are available at:
> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > > > > >  Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for
> the
> > > > > provider
> > > > > > packages.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > > > > >  Python "wheel" release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test
> this
> > > RC
> > > > is
> > > > > > described in:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Public keys are available at:
> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the
> > community
> > > > are
> > > > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > > > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > > > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept
> here:
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/34302
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can find packages as well as detailed changelog following the
> > > below
> > > > > > links:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-dbt-cloud/3.3.0rc2/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > Elad Kalif
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to