Thanks. Proceeding with the release, except Google, Databricks, that will get RC3.
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 3:03 PM Aritra Basu <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > -- > Regards, > Aritra Basu > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2023, 4:55 PM Amogh Desai <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 non binding > > > > On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 at 4:05 PM, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > +1 binding > > > > > > Let's get this out. > > > > > > B > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > > On 17 Dec 2023, at 09:20, Rahul Vats <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 non-binding > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Rahul Vats > > > > 9953794332 > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 at 13:18, utkarsh sharma < > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> +1 non-binding > > > >> > > > >> On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 at 1:15 PM, Pankaj Singh < > > [email protected]> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> +1 (non-binding) since we have excluded google and databricks > > providers > > > >>> from this release. > > > >>> > > > >>>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 12:48 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Bump .. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 6:26 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> One more +1 needed, please :) > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 1:39 PM Hussein Awala <[email protected]> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> +1 (binding) for daskexecutor, docker and odbc providers > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> On Thu 14 Dec 2023 at 13:37, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> A small reminder. Despite -1s on Google, databricks, i would > love > > > >> to > > > >>>>>> have > > > >>>>>>> some +1 on the remaining ones (daskexecutor, docker, odbc) - > we > > > >>> could > > > >>>>>>> release them now while we are iterating on the last remaining > > > >>>> databricks > > > >>>>>>> fix and release RC3 for the three removed. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Need two PMC +1s, pretty please :) . > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> J > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 2:08 PM Wei Lee <[email protected]> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> -1 (non-binding) for the google and databricks providers. Sent > > > >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36202 for fixing the > > > >>> google > > > >>>>>> issue > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>>> Wei > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> 於 2023年12月13日 週三 下午6:34寫道： > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Google and databricks will get RC3 (PRs to fix them are > > > >> already > > > >>>>>>> created). > > > >>>>>>>>> I'd still love to have +1 PMC votes on the remaining 3 :) > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> J > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 1:59 PM Pankaj Singh < > > > >>>>>> [email protected] > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> -1 (non-binding) for google and databricks providers since > > > >>> bug a > > > >>>>>> has > > > >>>>>>>> been > > > >>>>>>>>>> found. > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 3:45 PM Utkarsh Sharma > > > >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -1 (non-binding) > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I looked into Databricks providers and the PR > > > >>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32319> introduced > > > >>>>>> breaking > > > >>>>>>>>>> changes > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I have added my concern in the comment > > > >>>>>>>>>>> < > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36161/files#r1425078748 > > > >>>>>>> . > > > >>>>>>>>> Also, > > > >>>>>>>>>> I > > > >>>>>>>>>>> don't think there is an easy way to make row objects > > > >>>>>> serializable. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 12:28 PM Rahul Vats < > > > >>>>>>> [email protected]> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> -1 (non-binding) our example DAG failing for Google and > > > >>>>>>> Databricks > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> providers, We are working on fixes. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/10.13.0rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/5.1.0rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Rahul Vats > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 9953794332 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 at 11:35, Phani Kumar < > > > >>>>>>>> [email protected] > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> .invalid> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 non binding. We are finding failures in astro sdk > > > >>> DAGs > > > >>>>>> after > > > >>>>>>>>> using > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> databricks and google RC. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> We are working on creating PRs for the fixes. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> FAILED > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > tests_integration/databases/databricks_tests/test_delta.py::test_delta_run_sql > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - AttributeError: 'list' object has no attribute > > > >>> 'asDict' > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> FAILED > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > tests_integration/databases/databricks_tests/test_delta.py::test_delta_run_sql_with_parameters > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - AttributeError: 'list' object has no attribute > > > >>> 'asDict' > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> FAILED > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > tests_integration/databases/databricks_tests/test_delta.py::test_delta_create_table_with_columns[delta] > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - AssertionError: assert ['id', 'int', None] == > > > >>>>>>>> Row(col_name='id', > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> data_type='int', comment=None) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Full diff: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Row(col_name='id', data_type='int', comment=None) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + ['id', 'int', None] > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ERROR > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > tests_integration/databases/databricks_tests/test_delta.py::test_create_table_from_select_statement[delta] > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - airflow.exceptions.AirflowException: Databricks job > > > >>>>>> failed. > > > >>>>>>> Job > > > >>>>>>>>>> info > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ***'job_id': 438976959785934, 'run_id': > > > >> 268958235083047, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 'creator_user_name': '[email protected]', > > > >>>>>>>> 'number_in_job': > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 268958235083047, 'state': ***'life_cycle_state': > > > >>>>>> 'TERMINATED', > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 'result_state': 'FAILED', 'state_message': 'Workload > > > >>>> failed, > > > >>>>>>> see > > > >>>>>>>>> run > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> output > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> for details', 'user_cancelled_or_timedout': False***, > > > >>>>>> 'task': > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ***'spark_python_task': ***'python_file': > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > 'dbfs:/mnt/pyscripts/load_file__tmp_en0ra8imcxfee4sp8b9y4hzqj4bjy5y2fvgpo9gv0s3pzvmzqv1tfaza9.py'***, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 'cluster_spec': ***'existing_cluster_id': '***'***, > > > >>>>>>>>>> 'cluster_instance': > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ***'cluster_id': '***', 'spark_context_id': > > > >>>>>>>>> '4902558347078657686'***, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 'start_time': 1702436831591, 'setup_duration': 1000, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 'execution_duration': > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 12000, 'cleanup_duration': 0, 'end_time': > > > >> 1702436844777, > > > >>>>>>>>> 'run_name': > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 'Untitled', 'run_page_url': ' > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://dbc-9c390870-65ef.cloud.databricks.com/?o=4256138892007661#job/438976959785934/run/268958235083047 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ', > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 'run_type': 'SUBMIT_RUN', 'attempt_number': 0, > > > >> 'format': > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 'SINGLE_TASK'*** > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 4:02 AM Jarek Potiuk < > > > >>>>>> [email protected] > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [Filling-in for Elad, who had no time to do it this > > > >>>> time] > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers > > > >>> packages. > > > >>>>>> This > > > >>>>>>>>> email > > > >>>>>>>>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> calling a vote on the release, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which will last for 24 hours - which means that it > > > >>> will > > > >>>>>> end > > > >>>>>>> on > > > >>>>>>>>>>> December > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 13, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2023 22:00 PM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have > > > >>> been > > > >>>>>>>>> received. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Following our processes, this is an accelerated vote > > > >>>>>> taking > > > >>>>>>>> into > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> account > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the RC1 version has been tested and it only > > > >>>> contains > > > >>>>>>>>>> incremental > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Consider this my (binding) +1. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This release contains fixes to issues found in rc1 > > > >> in > > > >>>>>> google, > > > >>>>>>>>>> docker, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> odbc, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> databricks providers and the last (after scheduling > > > >>> for > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> removal) daskexecutor provider release. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Airflow Providers are available at: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are > > > >> the > > > >>>>>> binary > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Python "sdist" release - they are also official > > > >>>> "sources" > > > >>>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> provider > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> packages. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the > > > >>>> binary > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Python "wheel" release. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The test procedure for PMC members is described in > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The test procedure for and Contributors who would > > > >> like > > > >>>> to > > > >>>>>>> test > > > >>>>>>>>> this > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> described in: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Public keys are available at: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote accordingly: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members > > > >>> of > > > >>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>> community > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> are > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> encouraged to test the release and vote with > > > >>>>>> "(non-binding)". > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please note that the version number excludes the > > > >> 'rcX' > > > >>>>>>> string. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will allow us to rename the artifact without > > > >>>>>> modifying > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the artifact checksums when we actually release. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The status of testing the providers by the community > > > >>> is > > > >>>>>> kept > > > >>>>>>>>> here: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36194 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can find packages as well as detailed changelog > > > >>>>>> following > > > >>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>> below > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> links: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >> > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-daskexecutor/1.1.1rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/10.13.0rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/5.1.0rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-docker/3.9.0rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-odbc/4.3.0rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> J. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > >
