My vote goes to #36537.
But I think we should mention PR #22253 as a PR which finally merged -
"keep calm and add changes"


On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 17:36, Wei Lee <weilee...@gmail.com> wrote:

> My vote is for #36537. Love this packaging improvement!
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
> > On Jan 23, 2024, at 10:30 PM, Ryan Hatter 
> > <ryan.hat...@astronomer.io.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >
> > Gotta agree with Constance and go with 22253 -- how cool that the author
> > stuck with it all this time!
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:25 AM Aritra Basu <aritrabasu1...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> My vote is for #36537 it's been a huge effort and it makes huge
> >> improvements in our packaging. Great to see it make it into airflow.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Regards,
> >> Aritra Basu
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024, 10:13 AM Amogh Desai <amoghdesai....@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Is there a possibility to vote for more than one? I guess not :/
> >>>
> >>> My vote goes to #36537 for the enhancements that have come in with it.
> I
> >>> have followed the discussions
> >>> at a higher level and it surely wasn't easy :)
> >>> (If I could vote again, it would surely be #36537 for the endless
> >>> perseverance and dedication of the author)
> >>>
> >>> Thanks & Regards,
> >>> Amogh Desai
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 3:21 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Heck, why not. I will shamelessly vote on my #36537. While it took
> >> just a
> >>>> few weeks to merge, It leapfrogged our legacy packaging setup to
> >>>> more-or-less bleeding edge from what was there since the beginning of
> >>>> Airflow (almost 10 years) and was already "old-ish" when I joined the
> >>>> project more than 4 years ago. And with hatch and cleanups in extras,
> >> it
> >>>> has a positive impact on both - contributors and users (or so I hope).
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 7:48 PM Constance Martineau
> >>>> <consta...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1 #22253
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The PR was opened in March 2022, and was finally merged last week! I
> >>>> admire
> >>>>> the author's persistence in getting this merged in, and think the
> >>>>> simplifications to the interface make the Operator more user-friendly
> >>> for
> >>>>> our Data Science users.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 1:29 PM Briana Okyere
> >>>>> <briana.oky...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hey All,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It’s once again time to vote for the PR of the Month.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> With the help of the `get_important_pr_candidates` script in
> >>> dev/stats,
> >>>>>> we've identified the following candidates:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> PR #36513: Include plugins in the architecture diagrams.
> >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36513>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> PR #32867: Sanitize the conn_id to disallow potential script
> >>>> execution. <
> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32867>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> PR #22253: Add SparkKubernetesOperator crd implementation.
> >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22253>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> PR #36171: Implement AthenaSQLHook.
> >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36171>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> PR #36537: Standardize airflow build process and switch to
> >> Hatchling
> >>>>> build
> >>>>>> backend. <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36537>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please reply to this thread with your selection or offer your own
> >>>>>> nominee(s).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Voting will close on Jan. 26th at 1 PM PST. The winner(s) will be
> >>>>> featured
> >>>>>> in the next issue of the Airflow newsletter.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Also, if there’s an article or event that you think should be
> >>> included
> >>>> in
> >>>>>> this or a future issue of the newsletter, please drop me a line at
> >> <
> >>>>>> briana.oky...@astronomer.io>.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Briana Okyere
> >>>>>> Community Manager
> >>>>>> *Astronomer*
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Constance Martineau
> >>>>> Senior Product Manager
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Email: consta...@astronomer.io
> >>>>> Time zone: US Eastern (EST UTC-5 / EDT UTC-4)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <https://www.astronomer.io/>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to