dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Remove postrges from the Helm Chart Jarek Potiuk
• [DISCUSS] Merging cherry-picked PRs when green (and actually doing it) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Merging cherry-picked PRs when green (and actually doing it) Amogh Desai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Merging cherry-picked PRs when green (and actually doing it) Wei Lee
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Merging cherry-picked PRs when green (and actually doing it) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Merging cherry-picked PRs when green (and actually doing it) Pierre Jeambrun
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Merging cherry-picked PRs when green (and actually doing it) Amogh Desai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Merging cherry-picked PRs when green (and actually doing it) Wei Lee
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Merging cherry-picked PRs when green (and actually doing it) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Merging cherry-picked PRs when green (and actually doing it) Amogh Desai
• [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Christos Bisias
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Elad Kalif
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags asquator
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Christos Bisias
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags asquator
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Christos Bisias
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Daniel Standish
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Daniel Standish
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Daniel Standish
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Elad Kalif
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Christos Bisias
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Daniel Standish
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Christos Bisias
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags asquator
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Christos Bisias
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Daniel Standish
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Christos Bisias
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags asquator
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Daniel Standish
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Jigar Parekh
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Daniel Standish
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Daniel Standish
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Daniel Standish
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Christos Bisias
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Providers prepared on July 29, 2025 are released Elad Kalif
• [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - release of July 29, 2025 Elad Kalif
• [LAZY CONSENSUS] Remove developer dependencies from PyPI constrainst Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Remove developer dependencies from PyPI constrainst Jarek Potiuk
• [Meeting Notes] Airflow 3 dev call - 31 July 2025 Vikram Koka
• [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Improve filtering options API and UI Pierre Jeambrun
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Improve filtering options API and UI Jarek Potiuk
• 👀 The wait is over: Full program for Airflow Summit 2025 is now live! ➕ Special Discounts Teyza Ponce
• [REMINDER]: Airflow 3 Dev call on 31st July - agenda Vikram Koka
• [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 29, 2025 Elad Kalif
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 29, 2025 Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 29, 2025 Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 29, 2025 Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 29, 2025 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 29, 2025 Amogh Desai
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 29, 2025 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 29, 2025 Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 29, 2025 Elad Kalif
• [VOTE] July 2025 PR of the Month Briana Okyere
  • Re: [VOTE] July 2025 PR of the Month Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] July 2025 PR of the Month Pierre Jeambrun
  • Re: [VOTE] July 2025 PR of the Month Wei Lee
  • Re: [VOTE] July 2025 PR of the Month Aritra Basu
  • Re: [VOTE] July 2025 PR of the Month Amogh Desai
  • Re: [VOTE] July 2025 PR of the Month Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] July 2025 PR of the Month Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [VOTE] July 2025 PR of the Month Vincent Beck
  • Re: [VOTE] July 2025 PR of the Month Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: [VOTE] July 2025 PR of the Month Jed Cunningham
  • Re: [VOTE] July 2025 PR of the Month Shubham Raj
  • Re: [VOTE] July 2025 PR of the Month Kenten Danas
• [DISCUSS] Removing postgres frrom the helm chart (bitnami) ? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Removing postgres frrom the helm chart (bitnami) ? Aritra Basu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Removing postgres frrom the helm chart (bitnami) ? Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Removing postgres frrom the helm chart (bitnami) ? Amogh Desai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Removing postgres frrom the helm chart (bitnami) ? Jed Cunningham
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Removing postgres frrom the helm chart (bitnami) ? Vikram Koka
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Removing postgres frrom the helm chart (bitnami) ? Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Removing postgres frrom the helm chart (bitnami) ? Jarek Potiuk
• Pull Request Review Parag Kshirsagar
  • Re: Pull Request Review Jarek Potiuk
• [ANNOUNCE] Task SDK Integration Test Framework Merged Amogh Desai
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Task SDK Integration Test Framework Merged Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Task SDK Integration Test Framework Merged Aritra Basu
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Task SDK Integration Test Framework Merged Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Task SDK Integration Test Framework Merged Buğra Öztürk
• [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Sumit Maheshwari
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Sumit Maheshwari
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Igor Kholopov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Sumit Maheshwari
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Sumit Maheshwari
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Sumit Maheshwari
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Sumit Maheshwari
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Sumit Maheshwari
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Sumit Maheshwari
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Sumit Maheshwari
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Sumit Maheshwari
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-92 Isolate DAG parsing logic Kataria, Ramit
• شهادة الأبوة في المغرب walid falcon
• [DISCUSS] Improve test package hierarchy? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Improve test package hierarchy? Amogh Desai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Improve test package hierarchy? Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Improve test package hierarchy? Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Improve test package hierarchy? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Improve test package hierarchy? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Improve test package hierarchy? Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Improve test package hierarchy? Amogh Desai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Improve test package hierarchy? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Improve test package hierarchy? Jarek Potiuk
• [DISCUSS] Best practices for initializing `ObjectStoragePath` Josef Šimánek
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Best practices for initializing `ObjectStoragePath` Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Best practices for initializing `ObjectStoragePath` Bolke de Bruin
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Best practices for initializing `ObjectStoragePath` Josef Šimánek
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Best practices for initializing `ObjectStoragePath` Kevin Yang
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Best practices for initializing `ObjectStoragePath` Josef Šimánek
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Best practices for initializing `ObjectStoragePath` Kevin Yang
• [DISCUSS] Removing dev dependencies from PyPI constraints ? Jarek Potiuk
  • RE: [DISCUSS] Removing dev dependencies from PyPI constraints ? Damian Shaw
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Removing dev dependencies from PyPI constraints ? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Removing dev dependencies from PyPI constraints ? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Removing dev dependencies from PyPI constraints ? Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Removing dev dependencies from PyPI constraints ? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Removing dev dependencies from PyPI constraints ? Elad Kalif
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Removing dev dependencies from PyPI constraints ? Jarek Potiuk
• [DISCUSSION] "Freshness" in Multi-Asset Dag Triggering Conditions Dev iL
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] "Freshness" in Multi-Asset Dag Triggering Conditions Jarek Potiuk
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 reference images rebuilt Jarek Potiuk
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Providers prepared on July 17, 2025 are released Elad Kalif
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Providers prepared on July 17, 2025 are released Buğra Öztürk
• [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - release of July 17, 2025 Elad Kalif
• [Meeting Notes] Airflow 3 dev call - 17 July 2025 Vikram Koka
• [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 17, 2025 Elad Kalif
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 17, 2025 Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 17, 2025 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 17, 2025 Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 17, 2025 Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 17, 2025 Amogh Desai
• [REMINDER]: Airflow 3 Dev call on 17th July - agenda Vikram Koka
• [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Fix/Cleanup unreachable code mypy warnings Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Fix/Cleanup unreachable code mypy warnings Ankit Chaurasia
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Fix/Cleanup unreachable code mypy warnings Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Fix/Cleanup unreachable code mypy warnings Pavankumar Gopidesu
• Declarative DAGs with Pydantic / Hydra Tim Paine
  • Re: Declarative DAGs with Pydantic / Hydra Kevin Yang
  • Re: Declarative DAGs with Pydantic / Hydra Jens Scheffler
  • Re: Declarative DAGs with Pydantic / Hydra Jarek Potiuk
• [DISCUSSION] New Provider: Valkey (Redis OSS Fork) Ghaeli, Sean
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] New Provider: Valkey (Redis OSS Fork) Elad Kalif
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] New Provider: Valkey (Redis OSS Fork) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] New Provider: Valkey (Redis OSS Fork) Elad Kalif
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] New Provider: Valkey (Redis OSS Fork) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] New Provider: Valkey (Redis OSS Fork) Elad Kalif
  • Aw: Re: [DISCUSSION] New Provider: Valkey (Redis OSS Fork) Dominik Heilbock
  • Re: Re: [DISCUSSION] New Provider: Valkey (Redis OSS Fork) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] New Provider: Valkey (Redis OSS Fork) Ghaeli, Sean
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] New Provider: Valkey (Redis OSS Fork) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] New Provider: Valkey (Redis OSS Fork) Elad Kalif
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] New Provider: Valkey (Redis OSS Fork) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] New Provider: Valkey (Redis OSS Fork) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] New Provider: Valkey (Redis OSS Fork) Elad Kalif
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] New Provider: Valkey (Redis OSS Fork) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] New Provider: Valkey (Redis OSS Fork) Josef Šimánek
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] New Provider: Valkey (Redis OSS Fork) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] New Provider: Valkey (Redis OSS Fork) Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] New Provider: Valkey (Redis OSS Fork) Jarek Potiuk
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released Amogh Desai
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released Rich Bowen
  • [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow 3.0 Feathercast (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow 3.0 Feathercast (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released) Rich Bowen
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow 3.0 Feathercast (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow 3.0 Feathercast (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released) Aritra Basu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow 3.0 Feathercast (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released) Amogh Desai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow 3.0 Feathercast (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released) Bishundeo, Rajeshwar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow 3.0 Feathercast (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released) Jarek Potiuk
  • AW: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow 3.0 Feathercast (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released) Scheffler Jens (XC-AS/EAE-ADA-T)
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow 3.0 Feathercast (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released) Amogh Desai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow 3.0 Feathercast (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow 3.0 Feathercast (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released) Bowen, Rich
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow 3.0 Feathercast (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow 3.0 Feathercast (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released) Bowen, Rich
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow 3.0 Feathercast (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released) Bishundeo, Rajeshwar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow 3.0 Feathercast (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow 3.0 Feathercast (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released) Briana Okyere
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow 3.0 Feathercast (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released) Amogh Desai

• Earlier messages
• Later messages