+1 (non-binding) from me based on my past comments on the thread. -- Regards, Aritra Basu
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024, 8:07 PM Pankaj Koti <pankaj.k...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > Best regards, > > *Pankaj Koti* > Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team) > Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India > Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST) > Phone: +91 9730079985 > > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 8:05 PM Amogh Desai <amoghdesai....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 from me too based on my earlier points. > > > > Wondering if we can make it a little more rigid to address the concerns > > about hiding comments > > from the email thread earlier > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Amogh Desai > > > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 7:47 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > We have been discussing and arguing and it seems that we do not have a > > > consensus of whether "require conversation resolution" is a good idea, > as > > > promised I am casting a VOTE on it. > > > > > > The discussion is in this thread: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/bzg00p8yolboqgwlwfnlkdfvnn996601 > > > > > > Voting is according to https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > > (procedural). > > > Committers have binding votes. > > > > > > The voting will last for 72 hrs - till Thursday 15:30 CET. > > > > > > It gets +1 from my side. > > > > > > J. > > > > > >
