> Maybe we restrict who can post in development for a
period of time with a message directing folks to the right places?

As long as we don't make it committer only. If you're contributing
something and want some help/feedback, it's not welcoming to find out that
you're to be restricted from the development/contribution channel

On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 12:23 PM Ferruzzi, Dennis
<ferru...@amazon.com.invalid> wrote:

> I'm all for the shorter names.  I can never understand why so many people
> ask the questions they do in #development, its purpose seems pretty obvious
> to me but perhaps a rename is good for it; I'm -0 on that one.  I also
> agree that #troubleshooting is clear and nothing is gained from making it
> longer.  For the #best-practices one, I like the concept.  I wonder if
> something like #configuration-questions (I know, it's not short...) may be
> a broader category serving the same purpose?
>
>
>
>  - ferruzzi
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Jed Cunningham <jedcunning...@apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2024 8:36 AM
> To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [COURRIEL EXTERNE] [DISCUSS] Rename channels on
> slack
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
>
>
> AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un expéditeur externe.
> Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous ne pouvez
> pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas certain que
> le contenu ne présente aucun risque.
>
>
>
> Sounds good to me. We already have much more niche channels than best
> practices would be. Worst case no one uses it and we can purge it down the
> road, no harm no foul.
>
> One thing we should consider is not renaming development, but starting with
> a fresh channel for contributing. There are nearly 14k people in
> development today. Maybe we restrict who can post in development for a
> period of time with a message directing folks to the right places?
>

Reply via email to