+1 binding I like the thought behind this and understand why this was repeatedly asked by the community. Good work on the proposal so far!
Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 9:58 AM Rahul Vats <rah.sharm...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Regards, > Rahul Vats > 9953794332 > > > On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 22:46, Jed Cunningham <jedcunning...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hello Airflow Community, > > > > I would like to start a vote on AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history. > > > > You can find the AIP here: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-64%3A+Keep+TaskInstance+try+history > > > > Discussion Thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/vvm43tfchyo92hmf40fqvmq0f5845bjr > > > > This is the first step in the AIP-63 DAG Versioning journey, though this > > provides value in isolation as well: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-63%3A+DAG+Versioning > > > > The vote will last until 2024-03-28 17:30 UTC and until at least 3 > binding > > votes have been cast. > > > > Consider this my binding +1. > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > [ ] + 1 approve > > [ ] + 0 no opinion > > [ ] - 1 disapprove with the reason > > > > Only votes from PMC members and committers are binding, but other members > > of the community are encouraged to check the AIP and vote with > > "(non-binding)". > > > > Thanks, > > Jed > > >
