+1 binding ran some of my example dags all looks good On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 1:48 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> Changing my vote to +1 (binding). > > Updated the constraints for 2.9.2rc1 with **just released** providers > (celery 3.7.1, k8s 8.3.1 , amazon 8.24.0). Installed Airflow 2.9.2rc1 and > ran it with celery executor - and it works well this time). I also earlier > yanked celery-provider 3.7.1 to avoid people installing it accidentally. > > All looks good from my side - without having to release rc2. > > J. > > On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 7:37 AM Rahul Vats <rah.sharm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding). Verified running our example DAGs. LGTM > > > > Regards, > > Rahul Vats > > 9953794332 > > > > > > On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 at 01:21, Scheffler Jens (XC-AS/EAE-ADA-T) > > <jens.scheff...@de.bosch.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > +1 non binding > > > > > > Sent from Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Phani Kumar <phani.ku...@astronomer.io.INVALID> > > > Sent: Saturday, June 8, 2024 3:45:18 PM > > > To: dev@airflow.apache.org <dev@airflow.apache.org> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.9.2 from 2.9.2rc1 > > > > > > +1 non binding > > > > > > On Sat, 8 Jun 2024, 15:02 Hussein Awala, <huss...@awala.fr> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (binding) checked signatures, checksums, licences and sources. > > > > > > > > On Saturday, June 8, 2024, rom sharon <rom.sharo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
