+1 (binding) - while this one has some implications on scheduler- which I
think are important enough to hash out and design, I think it's good as is
- this can be done while we implement other things.

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 8:25 AM Scheffler Jens (XC-AS/EAE-ADA-T)
<jens.scheff...@de.bosch.com.invalid> wrote:

> +1 binding
> (I am not using backfill but from the AIP I feel that this consolidation
> is overdue and should be centralized)
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
>
> Jens Scheffler
>
> Alliance: Enabler - Tech Lead (XC-AS/EAE-ADA-T)
> Robert Bosch GmbH | Hessbruehlstraße 21 | 70565 Stuttgart-Vaihingen |
> GERMANY | http://www.bosch.com/
> Tel. +49 711 811-91508 | Mobil +49 160 90417410 |
> jens.scheff...@de.bosch.com
>
> Sitz: Stuttgart, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 14000;
> Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Stefan Asenkerschbaumer;
> Geschäftsführung: Dr. Stefan Hartung, Dr. Christian Fischer, Dr. Markus
> Forschner,
> Stefan Grosch, Dr. Markus Heyn, Dr. Frank Meyer, Dr. Tanja Rückert
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2024 2:49 AM
> To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] AIP-78 Scheduler-managed backfills
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I would like to call for a vote on AIP-78 on behalf of Daniel who is OOO.
>
> AIP link:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/0Q_TEg
>
> Discussion thread. Let me know if there are any outstanding questions that
> should be answered, otherwise looks like main discussions have already
> happened:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/p78py27z06fdtdlp9tj2vqm0t609zwk8
>
> The vote will run for ~5 days and last till next Tuesday, 2024-07-30
> 21:00 UTC.
>
> Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC members and Committer's
> votes are considered binding.
>
> This is my +1.
>
> Regards,
> Kaxil
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to