> Reschedulability in airflow (making up a word here) to my knowledge only exists to support reschedule mode in sensors.
Yes, this is true. On 13 November 2024 19:32:23 GMT, Daniel Standish <daniel.stand...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote: >The options are a bit muddled here. > >I think we need to separate what to do about the sensors we have in >providers from the core interface, essentially. > >Reschedulability in airflow (making up a word here) to my knowledge only >exists to support reschedule mode in sensors. > >Let's also separate poke from reschedule. > >For now, let's just look at reschedule. > >Let me enumerate some paths as i see them. > >1. remove the rescheduling interface in core. No more "up for reschedule" >state etc. No more reschedule mode in base sensor. No more reschedule mode >in any derivative sensor. >2. keep rescheduling in core. remove from base sensor and derivatives. >3. keep reschedule in core. keep in base sensor. remove from all >derivatives. ban the reintroduction of reschedule mode in derivative >sensors.