> Reschedulability in airflow (making up a word here) to my knowledge only
exists to support reschedule mode in sensors.

Yes, this is true.


On 13 November 2024 19:32:23 GMT, Daniel Standish 
<daniel.stand...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote:
>The options are a bit muddled here.
>
>I think we need to separate what to do about the sensors we have in
>providers from the core interface, essentially.
>
>Reschedulability in airflow (making up a word here) to my knowledge only
>exists to support reschedule mode in sensors.
>
>Let's also separate poke from reschedule.
>
>For now, let's just look at reschedule.
>
>Let me enumerate some paths as i see them.
>
>1. remove the rescheduling interface in core.  No more "up for reschedule"
>state etc.  No more reschedule mode in base sensor. No more reschedule mode
>in any derivative sensor.
>2. keep rescheduling in core. remove from base sensor and derivatives.
>3. keep reschedule in core. keep in base sensor. remove from all
>derivatives. ban the reintroduction of reschedule mode in derivative
>sensors.

Reply via email to