dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [DISCUSS]: Updated Provider governance process Jarek Potiuk
• [DISCUSS] Approach for bumping version of dependent providers Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Approach for bumping version of dependent providers Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Approach for bumping version of dependent providers Jarek Potiuk
• Bug report Khasim Shaik
  • Re: Bug report Jarek Potiuk
• [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Constance Martineau via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Vincent Beck
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Kataria, Ramit
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Oliveira, Niko
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Tzu-ping Chung via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Ankit Chaurasia
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Pankaj Koti via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Tamara Fingerlin via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Collin McNulty
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Ryan Hatter via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Wei Lee
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Tzu-ping Chung via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Sumit Maheshwari
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Josh Fell via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Bas Harenslak via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Pierre Jeambrun
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Brent Bovenzi via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Tzu-ping Chung via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Ryan Hatter via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Constance Martineau via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Pierre Jeambrun
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Amogh Desai
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Kiruban Kamaraj
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Bowrna Prabhakaran
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Bhavani Ravi
• [DISCUSS] Using PGBouncer vs, SQL Alchemy pooling in Airflow 3 ? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Using PGBouncer vs, SQL Alchemy pooling in Airflow 3 ? Jorrick Sleijster
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Using PGBouncer vs, SQL Alchemy pooling in Airflow 3 ? Jarek Potiuk
  • RE: [DISCUSS] Using PGBouncer vs, SQL Alchemy pooling in Airflow 3 ? Blain David
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Using PGBouncer vs, SQL Alchemy pooling in Airflow 3 ? Jarek Potiuk
• Airflow 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 Kaxil Naik
  • Re: Airflow 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 Vikram Koka via dev
  • Re: Airflow 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 Ferruzzi, Dennis
  • Re: Airflow 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Airflow 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 Vikram Koka via dev
• [ANNOUNCE] Breeze auto-upgrade mechanism and uv.lock Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Breeze auto-upgrade mechanism and uv.lock Amogh Desai
• Adding Japanese translation Tzu-ping Chung via dev
  • Re: Adding Japanese translation Kengo Seki
  • Re: Adding Japanese translation Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Adding Japanese translation Brent Bovenzi via dev
  • Re: Adding Japanese translation Wei Lee
  • Re: Adding Japanese translation Vikram Koka via dev
  • Re: Adding Japanese translation Amogh Desai
  • Re: Adding Japanese translation Shahar Epstein
  • RE: Re: Adding Japanese translation Sanda
  • Re: Re: Adding Japanese translation Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Re: Adding Japanese translation Kengo Seki
  • Re: Re: Adding Japanese translation Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Re: Adding Japanese translation Amogh Desai
• [DISCUSS] AIP-89: Privacy-First Telemetry for Apache Airflow Bolke de Bruin
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-89: Privacy-First Telemetry for Apache Airflow Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-89: Privacy-First Telemetry for Apache Airflow Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-89: Privacy-First Telemetry for Apache Airflow Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-89: Privacy-First Telemetry for Apache Airflow Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-89: Privacy-First Telemetry for Apache Airflow Jarek Potiuk
• [FEEDBACK] Airflow Summit Telemetry Survey Results Bolke de Bruin
• Upcoming Airflow 2.11.1 release [was: [DISCUSS] Possible Werkzeug vulnerabilities fix for Airflow 2] Jarek Potiuk
  • RE: Upcoming Airflow 2.11.1 release [was: [DISCUSS] Possible Werkzeug vulnerabilities fix for Airflow 2] Damian Shaw
  • Re: Upcoming Airflow 2.11.1 release [was: [DISCUSS] Possible Werkzeug vulnerabilities fix for Airflow 2] Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Upcoming Airflow 2.11.1 release [was: [DISCUSS] Possible Werkzeug vulnerabilities fix for Airflow 2] Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Upcoming Airflow 2.11.1 release [was: [DISCUSS] Possible Werkzeug vulnerabilities fix for Airflow 2] Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Upcoming Airflow 2.11.1 release [was: [DISCUSS] Possible Werkzeug vulnerabilities fix for Airflow 2] Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Upcoming Airflow 2.11.1 release [was: [DISCUSS] Possible Werkzeug vulnerabilities fix for Airflow 2] Jens Scheffler
  • Re: Upcoming Airflow 2.11.1 release [was: [DISCUSS] Possible Werkzeug vulnerabilities fix for Airflow 2] Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: Upcoming Airflow 2.11.1 release [was: [DISCUSS] Possible Werkzeug vulnerabilities fix for Airflow 2] Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Upcoming Airflow 2.11.1 release [was: [DISCUSS] Possible Werkzeug vulnerabilities fix for Airflow 2] Jarek Potiuk
• [VOTE] dag vs DAG vs Dag Constance Martineau via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] dag vs DAG vs Dag Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] dag vs DAG vs Dag Jarek Potiuk
• Re: [Lazy Concensus] Wrap up the Pydocstyle project Amogh Desai
  • Re: [Lazy Concensus] Wrap up the Pydocstyle project Ferruzzi, Dennis
  • Re: [Lazy Concensus] Wrap up the Pydocstyle project Amogh Desai
  • Re: [Lazy Concensus] Wrap up the Pydocstyle project Dennis Ferruzzi
  • Re: [Lazy Concensus] Wrap up the Pydocstyle project Amogh Desai
  • Re: [Lazy Concensus] Wrap up the Pydocstyle project Josh Fell via dev
• [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - release of September 18, 2025 Elad Kalif
• Re: [DISCUSS]: Proposal to focus on polishing Airflow 3 Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [DISCUSS]: Proposal to focus on polishing Airflow 3 Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: [DISCUSS]: Proposal to focus on polishing Airflow 3 Ferruzzi, Dennis
  • Re: [DISCUSS]: Proposal to focus on polishing Airflow 3 Kaxil Naik
• Mypy prek hooks moved to `pre-push` stage - QOL improvement Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Mypy prek hooks moved to `pre-push` stage - QOL improvement Dev iL
  • Re: Mypy prek hooks moved to `pre-push` stage - QOL improvement Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Mypy prek hooks moved to `pre-push` stage - QOL improvement Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Mypy prek hooks moved to `pre-push` stage - QOL improvement Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Mypy prek hooks moved to `pre-push` stage - QOL improvement Amogh Desai
  • Re: Mypy prek hooks moved to `pre-push` stage - QOL improvement Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Mypy prek hooks moved to `pre-push` stage - QOL improvement Pavankumar Gopidesu
• Re: Adding Greek translation Pierre Jeambrun
  • Re: Adding Greek translation Amogh Desai
• [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - release of October 01, 2025 Elad Kalif
• Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow 3.0 Feathercast (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow 3.0 Feathercast (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.0.3 Released) Jarek Potiuk
• Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 3.1.0 & Task SDK 1.1.0 Released Jens Scheffler
• [ANNOUNCE] 1 Month Left to Complete the 2025 Airflow Survey Briana Steel via dev
• [DISCUSS] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Constance Martineau via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Amogh Desai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Amogh Desai
• Re: AI-Native Airflow - LLM-Driven Intelligence for Production Data Workflows Giorgio Zoppi
  • Re: AI-Native Airflow - LLM-Driven Intelligence for Production Data Workflows Kaxil Naik
  • Re: AI-Native Airflow - LLM-Driven Intelligence for Production Data Workflows Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: AI-Native Airflow - LLM-Driven Intelligence for Production Data Workflows Giorgio Zoppi
  • Re: AI-Native Airflow - LLM-Driven Intelligence for Production Data Workflows Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: AI-Native Airflow - LLM-Driven Intelligence for Production Data Workflows Jens Scheffler
  • Re: AI-Native Airflow - LLM-Driven Intelligence for Production Data Workflows Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: AI-Native Airflow - LLM-Driven Intelligence for Production Data Workflows Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: AI-Native Airflow - LLM-Driven Intelligence for Production Data Workflows Giorgio Zoppi
  • Re: AI-Native Airflow - LLM-Driven Intelligence for Production Data Workflows Kaxil Naik
  • Re: AI-Native Airflow - LLM-Driven Intelligence for Production Data Workflows Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: AI-Native Airflow - LLM-Driven Intelligence for Production Data Workflows Oliveira, Niko
  • Re: AI-Native Airflow - LLM-Driven Intelligence for Production Data Workflows Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: AI-Native Airflow - LLM-Driven Intelligence for Production Data Workflows Alex
  • Re: AI-Native Airflow - LLM-Driven Intelligence for Production Data Workflows Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: AI-Native Airflow - LLM-Driven Intelligence for Production Data Workflows Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: AI-Native Airflow - LLM-Driven Intelligence for Production Data Workflows Kaxil Naik
  • Re: AI-Native Airflow - LLM-Driven Intelligence for Production Data Workflows Shahar Epstein
  • Re: AI-Native Airflow - LLM-Driven Intelligence for Production Data Workflows Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: AI-Native Airflow - LLM-Driven Intelligence for Production Data Workflows Oliveira, Niko
  • Re: AI-Native Airflow - LLM-Driven Intelligence for Production Data Workflows Shahar Epstein
  • Re: AI-Native Airflow - LLM-Driven Intelligence for Production Data Workflows Pavankumar Gopidesu
• SQLAlchemy 2 migration Beck, Vincent
  • Re: SQLAlchemy 2 migration Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: SQLAlchemy 2 migration Vincent Beck
  • Re: SQLAlchemy 2 migration Vincent Beck
  • Re: SQLAlchemy 2 migration Amogh Desai
  • Re: SQLAlchemy 2 migration Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: SQLAlchemy 2 migration Buğra Öztürk
• Re: Backporting/Cherry-picking & Marking issues & PRs for Airflow >3.1.0 Amogh Desai
• Re: [Discuss] Improving Airflow UI Testing Coverage Amogh Desai
  • Re: [Discuss] Improving Airflow UI Testing Coverage Shubham Raj
  • Re: [Discuss] Improving Airflow UI Testing Coverage Rahul Vats
  • Re: [Discuss] Improving Airflow UI Testing Coverage Vincent Beck
  • Re: [Discuss] Improving Airflow UI Testing Coverage Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [Discuss] Improving Airflow UI Testing Coverage Amogh Desai
  • Re: [Discuss] Improving Airflow UI Testing Coverage Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [Discuss] Improving Airflow UI Testing Coverage Rahul Vats
• Re: Adding Thai UI translation Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Adding Thai UI translation Srabasti Banerjee
  • Re: Adding Thai UI translation Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Adding Thai UI translation Pierre Jeambrun
• [ACCELERATED VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on September 28, 2025 Elad Kalif
• Re: [DISCUSS] Upcoming FAB 5 (we have a green PR!) needs more eyes Vincent Beck
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Upcoming FAB 5 (we have a green PR!) needs more eyes Jens Scheffler
• Re: [Discussion] Should We avoid using AirflowException direclty? Wei Lee
• RE: [VOTE] September 2025 PR of the Month Yeonguk Choo
• Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow official MCP Server Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow official MCP Server Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow official MCP Server Josef Šimánek
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow official MCP Server Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow official MCP Server Avi via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow official MCP Server Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow official MCP Server vaquar khan
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow official MCP Server Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow official MCP Server Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airflow official MCP Server Aritra Basu
• Re: [ACCELERATED VOTE] Release Airflow 3.1.0. from 3.1.0rc2 & Task SDK 1.1.0 from 1.1.0rc2 Wei Lee
  • RE: [ACCELERATED VOTE] Release Airflow 3.1.0. from 3.1.0rc2 & Task SDK 1.1.0 from 1.1.0rc2 Blain David
  • RE: [ACCELERATED VOTE] Release Airflow 3.1.0. from 3.1.0rc2 & Task SDK 1.1.0 from 1.1.0rc2 Blain David
• Re: New PMC members: VIncent Beck, Wei Lee and committer: Guan Ming Kaxil Naik
  • Re: New PMC members: VIncent Beck, Wei Lee and committer: Guan Ming Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: New PMC members: VIncent Beck, Wei Lee and committer: Guan Ming Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: New PMC members: VIncent Beck, Wei Lee and committer: Guan Ming Kataria, Ramit
  • Re: New PMC members: VIncent Beck, Wei Lee and committer: Guan Ming Wei Lee
  • Re: New PMC members: VIncent Beck, Wei Lee and committer: Guan Ming Josix Wang
  • Re: New PMC members: VIncent Beck, Wei Lee and committer: Guan Ming Pankaj Koti via dev
  • Re: New PMC members: VIncent Beck, Wei Lee and committer: Guan Ming Josh Fell via dev
  • Re: New PMC members: VIncent Beck, Wei Lee and committer: Guan Ming Bishundeo, Rajeshwar
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Providers prepared on October 01, 2025 are released Elad Kalif
• Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags asquator
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags asquator
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags asquator
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Scheduler does unnecessary processing when there are very large scheduled dags Natanel

• Later messages