Hello Vishnu,

We do not see the attachment so no idea which tests you are referring to.

Generally speaking - we treat our main "No broken window" policy - i.e.
sometimes things are breaking and we attempt to fix it quickly. If you
would like to help with that and help such failing tests - you can join
#internal-airlfow-ci-cd channel on Airflow Slack and every time there is a
failure, you can volunteer to help with  such an issue.

When it comes to individual tests - if you follow Contributor's guide and
setup the dev environment (particularly breeze docker compose environment)
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/README.rst  -
it is designed to avoid "works for me" syndrome where your local setup, old
dependencies, lack of system dependencies,different machine cause failures
on your local environment. Breeze is designed to provide everyone the same
dockerized environment where you should be able to replicate the same tests
that are run in CI and they **should** work in the same way.

If there are some differences in your environment that cause it (hard to
say what is failing because we do not see the screenshot of yours) then you
should be able to replicate non failing behaviour in breeze and possibly
even you could try to analyse the differences and maybe even propose PRs to
improve portability in your environment.

This documentation
https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/contributing-docs/testing
describes all the kinds of tests we have, how to replicate locally exactly
the same that works in CI.

There are also some tests that have side-effects or rely on side-effects of
other tests - when you see such a test failing when run in isolation, it's
a great idea to attempt to find and fix the issue. This is a nice
contribution.

J.


On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 9:00 PM Vishnu Chilukoori <vish.chiluko...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Devs,
>
> I was running core tests on the main branch of airflow and noticed a few
> tests are failing. Is this expected?
>
> [image: development_branch_unstable_test_runs.png]
>
> --
> Regards,
> Vishnu Chilukoori
>

Reply via email to