I even got to this stage: > We've received a few new tickets from your account recently. If you'd like to add additional information you can add a comment to an existing ticket, or wait a few minutes before opening a new ticket.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 11:49 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > There are few more that I still saw after sending it. There is something > going on bypassing GitHub filters. I hope they will manage to do something > about it > > Last one is https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/45867 > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 11:46 PM Vikram Koka <vik...@astronomer.io.invalid> > wrote: > >> Agreed. >> >> Thanks for flagging these Jarek! >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 2:34 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: >> >> > Seems that we have a flood of AI generated feature requests for Airflow, >> > The issues look somewhat legitimate, with somewhat related content, but >> > they are wordy and make no sense when you read them. Some examples: >> > >> > * https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/45858 >> > * https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/45856 >> > * https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/45854 >> > >> > All of them done by accounts with short history in GH and not much >> activity >> > before >> > >> > There were quite a few more. >> > >> > I suggest we close such issues AND report authors to GitHub - hopefully >> we >> > can help to battle the AI-generated traffic flood. >> > >> > J. >> > >> >
